Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 10:13 UTC

Luligu / matterbridge-eve-door

JavaScript · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗

Luligu/matterbridge-eve-door holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (36/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LuliguPersonal account
81 followers36 public repossince Apr 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume71 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year71
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases25 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tag3.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases18.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.8/80Monthly downloads3,864 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmatterbridge-eve-door
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads3,864
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

36Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.8/25Owner reach81 followers of Luligu
17.9/25Track record36 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers81
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginLuligu
public_repos36
account_age_days1,181
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history65 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmatterbridge-eve-door
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
3/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/matterbridge/matterbridge.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing/unit-tests.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0.5/40Legible commit history1 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.01
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/matterbridge/matterbridge.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing/unit-tests.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,488
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/13 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes12,196
source_files_sampled13
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
71commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index npm:matterbridge-eve-door@3.0.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 10:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmmatter-history1.2.2package.json
npmnode-ansi-logger3.3.0package.json
npmnode-persist-manager2.1.0package.json
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 169 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmmatter-history1.2.2direct
npmnode-ansi-logger3.2.1direct
npmnode-ansi-logger3.3.0direct
npmnode-persist-manager2.1.0direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm-eabi0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm640.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-arm640.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-x640.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-freebsd-x640.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-musl0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-s390x-gnu0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-musl0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-openharmony-arm640.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-arm64-msvc0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-ia32-msvc0.59.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-x64-msvc0.59.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-x640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-x640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-x640.25.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.1.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.5indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.3indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmoment2.30.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnode-persist4.0.4indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmoxfmt0.59.0indirect
npmoxlint1.74.0indirect
npmoxlint-tsgolint0.25.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.19indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinypool2.1.0indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.