Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 10:05 UTC

Mandark-droid / genai_otel_instrument

GenAI OpenTelemetry Auto-Instrumentation Library A comprehensive wrapper for automatic instrumentation of LLM/GenAI applications Supports all major LLM providers and MCP (Model Context Protocol) tool calls

PythonApache-2.0★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

Mandark-droid/genai_otel_instrument holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

kshitij thakkarPersonal account
15 followers86 public repossince Sep 2021Traceverse

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume378 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year378
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases82 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count82
latest_release_tagv1.27.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.5/80Monthly downloads4,343 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgenai-otel-instrument
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,343
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 86% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.862
How it's scored
38.5/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance16/17 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs16
open_issues1
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d10
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.917
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.7/25Owner reach15 followers of Mandark-droid
23/25Track record86 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMandark-droid
public_repos86
account_age_days1,829
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history89 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgenai-otel-instrument
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://mandark-droid.github.io/genai_otel_instrument/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, ai-observability, anthropic, cost-tracking, crewai, genai, gpu-metrics, instrumentation, langchain, llm, llm-observability, mcp, observability, openai, opentelemetry, python, amd-gpu, green-ai, nvidia, co2-tracking
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://mandark-droid.github.io/genai_otel_instrument/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifestspyproject.toml, requirements-dev.txt, requirements-testing.txt, requirements.txt, setup.py
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configno

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages1
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages106
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 6 resolved dependencies against OSV. 106 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checkinggenai_otel/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsgenai_otel/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (genai_otel/py.typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes3/384 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes135,925
source_files_sampled384
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
2contributors
378commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
82releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:genai-otel-instrument@1.27.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIopentelemetry-api>=1.20.0,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk>=1.20.0,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation>=0.41b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions>=0.45b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp>=1.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwrapt>=1.14.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 112

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIopentelemetry-apidirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlpdirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentationdirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdkdirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventionsdirect
PyPIwraptdirect
PyPIamdsmiindirect
PyPIanthropicindirect
PyPIautogen-agentchatindirect
PyPIazure-ai-inferenceindirect
PyPIbanditindirect
PyPIblackindirect
PyPIboto3indirect
PyPIbuildindirect
PyPIchromadbindirect
PyPIcodecarbonindirect
PyPIcohereindirect
PyPIcrewaiindirect
PyPIdetoxifyindirect
PyPIdspy-aiindirect
PyPIelasticsearchindirect
PyPIelevenlabsindirect
PyPIfaiss-cpuindirect
PyPIfalkordbindirect
PyPIflake8indirect
PyPIgoogle-adkindirect
PyPIgoogle-api-python-clientindirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-aiplatformindirect
PyPIgoogle-generativeaiindirect
PyPIgroqindirect
PyPIguardrails-aiindirect
PyPIhaystack-aiindirect
PyPIhttpxindirect
PyPIinstructorindirect
PyPIisortindirect
PyPIkafka-pythonindirect
PyPIkafka-python2.0.2indirect
PyPIlancedbindirect
PyPIlangchainindirect
PyPIlangchain-openaiindirect
PyPIlanggraphindirect
PyPIliquid-audioindirect
PyPIlitellmindirect
PyPIllama-cpp-pythonindirect
PyPIllama-indexindirect
PyPImcpindirect
PyPIminioindirect
PyPImistralaiindirect
PyPImypyindirect
PyPImysql-connector-pythonindirect
PyPInvidia-ml-pyindirect
PyPIollamaindirect
PyPIopenaiindirect
PyPIopencv-python-headlessindirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentationindirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation0.1.31indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-litellmindirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-litellm0.1.19indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-mcpindirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-mcp1.3.0indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-smolagentsindirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-smolagents0.1.11indirect
PyPIopeninference-semantic-conventions0.1.17indirect
PyPIopensearch-pyindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-httpindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-elasticsearchindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-httpxindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-kafka-pythonindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-mysqlindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-opensearch-pyindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg2indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-pymongoindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-redisindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-requestsindirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemyindirect
PyPIpikaindirect
PyPIpillowindirect
PyPIpineconeindirect
PyPIpresidio-analyzerindirect
PyPIpresidio-anonymizerindirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binaryindirect
PyPIpyautogenindirect
PyPIpydantic-aiindirect
PyPIpylintindirect
PyPIpymilvusindirect
PyPIpymongoindirect
PyPIpypdfindirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest-asyncioindirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-mockindirect
PyPIqdrant-clientindirect
PyPIredisindirect
PyPIreplicateindirect
PyPIrequestsindirect
PyPIsafetyindirect
PyPIsambanovaindirect
PyPIsarvamaiindirect
PyPIsentence-transformersindirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIsetuptools-scmindirect
PyPIspacyindirect
PyPIsphinxindirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-themeindirect
PyPIsqlalchemyindirect
PyPItogetherindirect
PyPItorchindirect
PyPItransformersindirect
PyPItwineindirect
PyPIvllmindirect
PyPIweaviate-clientindirect
PyPIwheelindirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 6 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 106 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
kafka-python2.0.2indirecthigh42.3.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.