Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 06:03 UTC

ManotLuijiu / pi-harness-runtime

Meter of LLM Usage in pi.dev

TypeScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

ManotLuijiu/pi-harness-runtime holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Manot LuijiuPersonal account
13 followers320 public repossince Jun 2016Moo Coding

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmpi-harness-runtime0.9.73,169194 days agopi-packagepipi-coding-agentextensionusagetokenscostcodex

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

57Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 103 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year103
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv0.9.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases0.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.7/80Monthly downloads — 3,169 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespi-harness-runtime
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,169
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

29At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.544

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
28.4/30PR acceptance — 54/57 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs54
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of ManotLuijiu
25/25Track record — 320 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginManotLuijiu
public_repos320
account_age_days3,683
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 19 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespi-harness-runtime
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,032
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/a2a-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/autonomous-refactor/tsconfig.json, packages/cache-strategy/tsconfig.json, packages/capability-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/checkpoint/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugin-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/code-generation/tsconfig.json, packages/code-review/tsconfig.json, packages/codex-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/context-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/context-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/cost-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/django-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/doc-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/evaluation-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/evaluation-runner/tsconfig.json, packages/experience-replay/tsconfig.json, packages/feedback-collector/tsconfig.json, packages/framework-detector/tsconfig.json, packages/framework-plugin-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/frappe-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/generic-web-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/health-monitor/tsconfig.json, packages/laravel-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/learning-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/memory-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/model-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/nextjs-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/notification/tsconfig.json, packages/observability/tsconfig.json, packages/performance-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/project-analyzer/tsconfig.json, packages/prompt-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/prompt-versioning/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-adapter-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-router/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-selector/tsconfig.json, packages/providers/tsconfig.json, packages/quota-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/rate-limiter/tsconfig.json, packages/react-vite-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/release-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/requirement-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime/tsconfig.json, packages/session/tsconfig.json, packages/skill-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/sprint-planner/tsconfig.json, packages/task-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/test-data-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/test-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/token-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/tui/tsconfig.json, packages/types/tsconfig.json, packages/worktree/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/a2a-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/autonomous-refactor/tsconfig.json, packages/cache-strategy/tsconfig.json, packages/capability-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/checkpoint/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugin-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/code-generation/tsconfig.json, packages/code-review/tsconfig.json, packages/codex-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/context-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/context-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/cost-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/django-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/doc-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/evaluation-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/evaluation-runner/tsconfig.json, packages/experience-replay/tsconfig.json, packages/feedback-collector/tsconfig.json, packages/framework-detector/tsconfig.json, packages/framework-plugin-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/frappe-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/generic-web-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/health-monitor/tsconfig.json, packages/laravel-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/learning-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/memory-engine/tsconfig.json, packages/model-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/nextjs-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/notification/tsconfig.json, packages/observability/tsconfig.json, packages/performance-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/project-analyzer/tsconfig.json, packages/prompt-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/prompt-versioning/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-adapter-sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-router/tsconfig.json, packages/provider-selector/tsconfig.json, packages/providers/tsconfig.json, packages/quota-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/rate-limiter/tsconfig.json, packages/react-vite-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/release-manager/tsconfig.json, packages/requirement-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime/tsconfig.json, packages/session/tsconfig.json, packages/skill-registry/tsconfig.json, packages/sprint-planner/tsconfig.json, packages/task-compiler/tsconfig.json, packages/test-data-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/test-generator/tsconfig.json, packages/token-optimizer/tsconfig.json, packages/tui/tsconfig.json, packages/types/tsconfig.json, packages/worktree/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/390 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes52,566
source_files_sampled390
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
103commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index npm:pi-harness-runtime@0.9.7; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 06:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmdeepagents^1.10.5package.json
npmpi-harness-runtime^0.3.2-beta.1package.json
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmdeepagents^1.10.5direct
npmpi-harness-runtime^0.3.2-beta.1direct
npm@biomejs/biome^2.4.7indirect
npm@biomejs/biome^2.5.3indirect
npm@commitlint/cli^20.3.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional^20.3.1indirect
npm@types/node^20.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^20.11.0indirect
npm@types/node^20.14.0indirect
npm@types/node^22.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^26.1.0indirect
npm@types/ws^8.18.1indirect
npmbun-types^1.0.0indirect
npmbun-types^1.3.14indirect
npmexeca^9.5.2indirect
npmhusky^9.1.7indirect
npmopenai^4.85.0indirect
npmplaywright^1.61.1indirect
npmstandard-version^9.5.0indirect
npmtypescript^7.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ManotLuijiu/pi-harness-runtime. Read them side by side →

81narumiruna/pi-extensionsA TypeScript monorepo of Pi Coding Agent extensions for automation, planning, language tooling, browser control, web research, Git workflows, and configuration sync.Excellent81douglasmonsky/codex-usage-trackerLocal-first MCP tools and dashboard for investigating Codex token usage, credits, costs, caching, and thread patterns.Excellent93soju06/codex-lbCodex/ChatGPT multiple account load balancer & proxy with usage tracking, dashboard, and OpenCode-compatible endpointsExceptional92Observal/ObservalObserval is a local registry and analytics platform for your AI components. Setup Observal, define the scope and share your Skills, MCPs and Agents.Excellent92agent-of-empires/agent-of-empiresManage multiple Claude Code, OpenCode agents from either TUI or Web for easy access on mobile. Also supports Mistral Vibe, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Pi.dev, Copilot CLI, Factory Droid Coding.Excellent91backnotprop/plannotatorAnnotate and review coding agent plans and code diffs visually, share with your team, send feedback to agents with one click.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.