Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 23:54 UTC

MarkusEggerInc / CODEFrameworkCore

CODE Framework for .NET Core

HTMLMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

MarkusEggerInc/CODEFrameworkCore holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Security (42/100) and lowest on Vitality (1/100). It was last updated 1395 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 28 is calibrated to 22 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MarkusEggerIncOrganization
0 followers3 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetCODE.Framework.Fundamentals2.1.0-520 days ago
NuGetCODE.Framework.Services.Client2.1.0-520 days ago
NuGetCODE.Framework.Services.Contracts2.1.0-510 days ago
NuGetCODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore2.1.0-520 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

1Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,395 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,395
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

10Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good
How it's scored
55.7/80Total downloads — 228,886 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCODE.Framework.Fundamentals, CODE.Framework.Services.Client, CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts, CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads228,886
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.782

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — 0/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of MarkusEggerInc
16.4/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginMarkusEggerInc
public_repos3
account_age_days4,384

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 52 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCODE.Framework.Fundamentals, CODE.Framework.Services.Client, CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts, CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

28At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 6 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

21At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1/40Legible commit history — 1 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.018
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

23At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — CODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Client/CODE.Framework.Services.Client.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts/CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 55
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Client/CODE.Framework.Services.Client.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts/CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore.DockerService/CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore.DockerService.csproj, CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore/CODE.Framework.Services.Server.AspNetCore.csproj, Sample.Client.Console/Sample.Client.Console.csproj, Sample.Client.ConsoleInProcess/Sample.Client.ConsoleInProcess.csproj, Sample.Client.Web/Sample.Client.Web.csproj, Sample.Contracts/Sample.Contracts.csproj, Sample.Services.Implementation/Sample.Services.Implementation.csproj, Sample.Web/Sample.Web.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 2/98 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes85,264
source_files_sampled98
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

4GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,395days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 23:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMarkdig0.26.0CODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions6.0.0CODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1CODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit4.7.0CODE.Framework.Fundamentals/CODE.Framework.Fundamentals.csproj
NuGetSystem.ServiceModel.Primitives4.9.0CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts/CODE.Framework.Services.Contracts.csproj
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore6.3.0Sample.Web/Sample.Web.csproj
All dependencies 6

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMarkdig0.26.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions6.0.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore6.3.0direct
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit4.7.0direct
NuGetSystem.ServiceModel.Primitives4.9.0direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 6 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with MarkusEggerInc/CODEFrameworkCore. Read them side by side →

100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnetThe OpenTelemetry .NET ClientExceptional99microsoft/microsoft-ui-xamlWinUI: a modern UI framework with a rich set of controls and styles to build dynamic and high-performing Windows applications.Exceptional99microsoft/onnxruntime-genaiGenerative AI extensions for onnxruntimeExceptional99AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98dotnet/orleansCloud Native application framework for .NETExceptional98microsoft/vstestVisual Studio Test Platform is the runner and engine that powers test explorer and vstest.console.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.