Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 15:56 UTC

MenkeTechnologies / fusevm

RustMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗

MenkeTechnologies/fusevm holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MenkeTechnologiesPersonal account
74 followers436 public repossince Mar 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iofusevm0.23.05,431531 day agobytecodefusevminterpreterjitvmcompilers

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume223 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year223
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases29 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv0.23.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars4 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.8/80Monthly downloads5,431 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfusevm
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads21,996
monthly_downloads5,431
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.5/25Owner reach74 followers of MenkeTechnologies
25/25Track record436 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers74
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMenkeTechnologies
public_repos436
account_age_days3,795
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history53 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfusevm
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/fusevm
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/fusevm
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: bincode 1.3.3 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 249 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages145
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 145 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history90 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.9
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
51.9/55Manageable file sizes5/89 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes3,138,015
source_files_sampled89
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
223commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
29releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 15:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-jit0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-codegen0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-frontend0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-native0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-module0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iocranelift-object0.130Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode1Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 131 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobase640.22.1direct
crates.iobincode1.3.3direct
crates.iochrono0.4.45direct
crates.iocranelift-codegen0.130.2direct
crates.iocranelift-frontend0.130.2direct
crates.iocranelift-jit0.130.2direct
crates.iocranelift-module0.130.2direct
crates.iocranelift-native0.130.2direct
crates.iocranelift-object0.130.2direct
crates.ioglob0.3.3direct
crates.iolibc0.2.186direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.iosha20.10.9direct
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioallocator-api20.2.21indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103indirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.4.2indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocranelift-assembler-x640.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-assembler-x64-meta0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-bforest0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-bitset0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-codegen-meta0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-codegen-shared0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-control0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-entity0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-isle0.130.2indirect
crates.iocranelift-srcgen0.130.2indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.iocriterion0.5.1indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogimli0.33.0indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.17indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomach20.4.3indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioobject0.38.1indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregalloc20.15.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.16indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioregion3.0.2indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.3indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasmtime-internal-core43.0.2indirect
crates.iowasmtime-internal-jit-icache-coherence43.0.2indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.54indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.54indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 145 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
bincode1.3.3directunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.