Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 16:06 UTC

MetaCubeX / ClashMetaForAndroid

A rule-based tunnel for Android.

KotlinGPL-3.0★ 46,249 stars⑂ 2,890 forkssince Jun 2022forkView on GitHub ↗

KindMobile applicationhow this is determined

MetaCubeX/ClashMetaForAndroid holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (27/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MetaCubeXOrganization

5,878 followers93 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.8/36	Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
17.8/18	Commit volume — 94 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	94
human_commit_share	0.73
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	30

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~17.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	50
latest_release_tag	v2.11.34
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	2
mean_days_between_releases	17.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

98Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 46,249 stars
25/25	Forks — 2,890 forks
12.7/15	Watchers — 191 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2,890
stars	46,249
watchers	191
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

74Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 47 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	47
top_contributor_share	0.353

Issue & PR responsiveness

47Weak

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
22.7/30	PR acceptance — 177/234 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	177
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	57
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

79Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 5,878 followers of MetaCubeX
23.7/25	Track record — 93 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	5,878
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	MetaCubeX
public_repos	93
account_age_days	1,947

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

1Critical

How it's scored

0/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 7/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 39 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	58
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	132
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, moderate 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 132 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.3/40	Legible commit history — 21 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.288
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — app/build.gradle.kts, build.gradle.kts, common/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Kotlin (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	app/build.gradle.kts, build.gradle.kts, common/build.gradle.kts, core/build.gradle.kts, core/src/foss/golang/go.mod, core/src/main/golang/go.mod, design/build.gradle.kts, hideapi/build.gradle.kts, service/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/294 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Kotlin
largest_source_bytes	19,977
source_files_sampled	294
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

46,249GitHub stars

47contributors

94commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

50releases

3bus factor

0open issues

Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,890 ⇿

0Stars

2,890Forks

17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 16

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 16:06 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 7/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10	Contributors	project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	39 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 132

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/ajg/form	`v1.7.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/akutz/memconn	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/andybalholm/brotli	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/bahlo/generic-list-go	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bodgit/plumbing	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bodgit/windows	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/coreos/go-iptables	`v0.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2	`v1.12.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/dunglas/httpsfv	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/easytier/easytier/easytier-go	`v0.0.0-20260910071355-3d0c9c3ca5e2`	indirect
Go	github.com/enfein/mieru/v3	`v3.37.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/ericlagergren/aegis	`v0.0.0-20250325060835-cd0defd64358`	indirect
Go	github.com/ericlagergren/polyval	`v0.0.0-20220411101811-e25bc10ba391`	indirect
Go	github.com/ericlagergren/siv	`v0.0.0-20220507050439-0b757b3aa5f1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ericlagergren/subtle	`v0.0.0-20220507045147-890d697da010`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2	`v2.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gaukas/godicttls	`v0.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-ole/go-ole	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gobwas/httphead	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gobwas/pool	`v0.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/gobwas/ws	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gofrs/uuid/v5	`v5.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/groupcache	`v0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/snappy	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/btree	`v1.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/pprof	`v0.0.0-20240727154555-813a5fbdbec8`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2	`v2.0.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/insomniacslk/dhcp	`v0.0.0-20250109001534-8abf58130905`	indirect
Go	github.com/josharian/native	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jsimonetti/rtnetlink	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.9`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2	`v2.2.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/reedsolomon	`v1.12.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/mdlayher/netlink	`v1.7.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/mdlayher/socket	`v0.5.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/age	`v0.0.0-20260603010618-28d156b4ea78`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/amneziawg-go	`v0.0.0-20260908071407-0c1c6f40ecd7`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/ascon	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/bart	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/bbolt	`v0.0.0-20260706163408-d4ec34ad7c48`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/blake3	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/chacha	`v0.1.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/chi	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/connect-ip-go	`v0.0.0-20260727083417-67ccdb0cf771`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/cpu	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/edwards25519	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/fswatch	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/gopacket	`v1.1.20-0.20230608035415-7e2f98a3e759`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/gvisor	`v0.0.0-20260826100401-79317d808312`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/hkdf	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/hpke	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/http	`v0.1.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/jls-quic-go	`v0.0.0-20260727080412-732f2fc9a34d`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/jls-tls	`v0.0.0-20260723084315-67adc0e2f796`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/jsonv2	`v0.0.0-20260721082349-16b4998c8f89`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/kcp-go	`v0.0.0-20260105040817-550693377604`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/mhurl	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/mipstack	`v0.0.0-20260910230046-ba762df4c91d`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/mlkem	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/nftables	`v0.0.0-20260426003805-208c2c1ba2cb`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/qpack	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/quic-go	`v0.61.1-0.20260727080200-2548683b76f4`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/randv2	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/restls-client-go	`v0.1.9`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sevenzip	`v1.6.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing	`v0.5.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-mux	`v0.3.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-quic	`v0.0.0-20260904234848-1c242664697a`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks	`v0.2.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks2	`v0.2.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-tun	`v0.4.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-vmess	`v0.2.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/sing-wireguard	`v0.0.0-20260826105301-c3ae17d19f9e`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/smux	`v0.0.0-20260105030934-d0c8756d3141`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/ssh	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/tailscale	`v0.0.0-20260821153257-ff0ecd818181`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/tailscale-wireguard-go	`v0.0.0-20260725073821-e61ab99cede2`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/tfo-go	`v0.0.0-20260623020846-376a77860b8c`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/tls	`v0.1.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/utls	`v1.8.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/wazero	`v0.0.0-20260628025728-9ae6bdcf2a7d`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/wireguard-go	`v0.0.0-20250820062549-a6cecdd7f57f`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/yamux	`v0.0.0-20250918083631-dd5f17c0be49`	indirect
Go	github.com/metacubex/zerotier-go	`v0.0.0-20260813124750-13fa6f45da5f`	indirect
Go	github.com/miekg/dns	`v1.1.63`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-ps	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mroth/weightedrand/v2	`v2.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/oasisprotocol/deoxysii	`v0.0.0-20220228165953-2091330c22b7`	indirect
Go	github.com/openacid/low	`v0.1.21`	indirect
Go	github.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golang	`v1.12.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pierrec/lz4/v4	`v4.1.27`	indirect
Go	github.com/pires/go-proxyproto	`v0.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rasky/go-lzo	`v0.0.0-20200203143853-96a758eda86e`	indirect
Go	github.com/ryuanerin/go-krypto	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/safchain/ethtool	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagernet/netlink	`v0.0.0-20240612041022-b9a21c07ac6a`	indirect
Go	github.com/samber/lo	`v1.53.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sina-ghaderi/poly1305	`v0.0.0-20220724002748-c5926b03988b`	indirect
Go	github.com/sina-ghaderi/rabaead	`v0.0.0-20220730151906-ab6e06b96e8c`	indirect
Go	github.com/sina-ghaderi/rabbitio	`v0.0.0-20220730151941-9ce26f4f872e`	indirect
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/stangelandcl/ppmd	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tailscale/certstore	`v0.1.1-0.20260409135935-3638fb84b77d`	indirect
Go	github.com/tailscale/go-winio	`v0.0.0-20231025203758-c4f33415bf55`	indirect
Go	github.com/tailscale/hujson	`v0.0.0-20221223112325-20486734a56a`	indirect
Go	github.com/tailscale/peercred	`v0.0.0-20250107143737-35a0c7bd7edc`	indirect
Go	github.com/u-root/uio	`v0.0.0-20230220225925-ffce2a382923`	indirect
Go	github.com/ulikunitz/xz	`v0.5.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/vishvananda/netns	`v0.0.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5	`v5.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2	`v2.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/x448/float16	`v0.8.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/yawning/aez	`v0.0.0-20211027044916-e49e68abd344`	indirect
Go	github.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3	`v3.0.2`	indirect
Go	gitlab.com/go-extension/aes-ccm	`v0.0.0-20230221065045-e58665ef23c7`	indirect
Go	gitlab.com/yawning/bsaes.git	`v0.0.0-20190805113838-0a714cd429ec`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.5`	indirect
Go	go4.org/mem	`v0.0.0-20240501181205-ae6ca9944745`	indirect
Go	go4.org/netipx	`v0.0.0-20231129151722-fdeea329fbba`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.33.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20240904232852-e7e105dedf7e`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.20.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.35.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.30.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`v0.10.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.24.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 132 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.33.0`	indirect	critical	37	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.35.0`	indirect	moderate	15	`1.27.0-rc.3`
github.com/insomniacslk/dhcp	`v0.0.0-20250109001534-8abf58130905`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.0.0-20260719225207-c76316d4aa82`
github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.9`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.18.7`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.20.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.30.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.22.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records