Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 01:37 UTC

MetaCubeX / mihomo

A simple Python Pydantic model for Honkai: Star Rail parsed data from the Mihomo API.

PythonMIT★ 32,933 stars⑂ 4,330 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗

MetaCubeX/mihomo holds a health index of 46 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

46
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

46
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MetaCubeXOrganization
5,680 followers92 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPImihomopoints to another repo — not scored3.6.0-14307 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases61 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 722 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~-63.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagPrerelease-Alpha
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release722
mean_days_between_releases-63.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars32,933 stars
25/25Forks4,330 forks
12/15Watchers147 watchers
Inputs used
forks4,330
stars32,933
watchers147
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.962
How it's scored
32.6/42Issue resolution78% of issues closed
16.4/30PR acceptance318/583 decided PRs merged
5.6/13Newcomer PR acceptance6/14 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs318
open_issues443
closed_issues1,522
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d15
prs_merged_30d22
prs_decided_30d53
issue_closed_ratio0.775
closed_unmerged_prs265
first_time_authors_30d7
first_time_prs_merged_30d6
first_time_prs_decided_30d14
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach5,680 followers of MetaCubeX
23.4/25Track record92 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,680
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginMetaCubeX
public_repos92
account_age_days1,904
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://wiki.metacubex.one
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshonkai-star-rail, mihomo, python, star-rail-api
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://wiki.metacubex.one
docs_sitehttps://wiki.metacubex.one
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:mihomo@3.6.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history25 of 26 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.962
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 26
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes4,632
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

32,933GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
61releases
1bus factor
443open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 27 authors (cap 12)
  • pypi package 'mihomo' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Mar-7th/mihomo.py); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4,330 ⇿
0Stars
4,330Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

3,2003,4003,6003,8004,0004,2004,4004,330152025-112026-032026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 13
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 01:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained0 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp==3.*pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==1.*pyproject.toml
All dependencies 162

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 160 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.*direct
PyPIpydantic1.*direct
Gogithub.com/3andne/restls-client-go0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aead/chacha200.0.0-20180709150244-8b13a72661daindirect
Gogithub.com/ajg/form1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotli1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotli1.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/bahlo/generic-list-go0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparser1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cilium/ebpf0.12.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circl1.3.7indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-iptables0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/reference0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp21.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp21.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/distribution2.8.3+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker20.10.21+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connections0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-units0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ericlagergren/aegis0.0.0-20230312195928-b4ce538b56f9indirect
Gogithub.com/ericlagergren/polyval0.0.0-20220411101811-e25bc10ba391indirect
Gogithub.com/ericlagergren/siv0.0.0-20220507050439-0b757b3aa5f1indirect
Gogithub.com/ericlagergren/subtle0.0.0-20220507045147-890d697da010indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gaukas/godicttls0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v55.0.12indirect
Gogithub.com/go-chi/cors1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-chi/render1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-ole1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-task/slim-sprig0.0.0-20230315185526-52ccab3ef572indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/httphead0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/pool0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/ws1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/ws1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gofrs/uuid/v55.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gofrs/uuid/v55.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btree1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprof0.0.0-20210407192527-94a9f03dee38indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamux0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/insomniacslk/dhcp0.0.0-20231016090811-6a2c8fbdcc1cindirect
Gogithub.com/insomniacslk/dhcp0.0.0-20240419123447-f1cffa2c0c49indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/native1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoff1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.16.7indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.17.4indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v22.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v22.2.7indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9stats0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0indirect
Gogithub.com/lunixbochs/struc0.0.0-20200707160740-784aaebc1d40indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mdlayher/netlink1.7.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mdlayher/socket0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/gopacket1.1.20-0.20230608035415-7e2f98a3e759indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/gvisor0.0.0-20231001104248-0f672c3fb8d8indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/gvisor0.0.0-20240320004321-933faba989ecindirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/mihomo0.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/quic-go0.40.1-0.20231130135418-0c1b47cf9394indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/quic-go0.44.1-0.20240521004242-fcd70d587e22indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-quic0.0.0-20231130141855-0022295e524bindirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-quic0.0.0-20240518034124-7696d3f7da72indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks0.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks0.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks20.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-shadowsocks20.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-tun0.1.15-0.20231103033938-170591e8d5bdindirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-tun0.2.7-0.20240512075008-89e7c6208eecindirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-vmess0.1.9-0.20230921005247-a0488d7dac74indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-vmess0.1.9-0.20231207122118-72303677451findirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-wireguard0.0.0-20231001110902-321836559170indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/sing-wireguard0.0.0-20240321042214-224f96122a63indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/tfo-go0.0.0-20240228025757-be1269474a66indirect
Gogithub.com/metacubex/utls1.6.6indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winio0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dns1.1.57indirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dns1.1.59indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/term0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aec1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mroth/weightedrand/v22.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/oasisprotocol/deoxysii0.0.0-20220228165953-2091330c22b7indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v22.9.5indirect
Gogithub.com/openacid/low0.1.21indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digest1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-spec1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golang1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v44.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstat0.0.0-20210106213030-5aafc221ea8cindirect
Gogithub.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v33.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v33.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpack0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qtls-go1-200.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ryuanerin/go-krypto1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/ryuanerin/go-krypto1.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/bbolt0.0.0-20231014093535-ea5cb2fe9f0aindirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/go-tun2socks1.16.12-0.20220818015926-16cb67876a61indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/netlink0.0.0-20220905062125-8043b4a9aa97indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/sing0.2.18-0.20231108041402-4fbbd193203cindirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/sing0.3.8indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/sing-mux0.1.5-0.20231109075101-6b086ed6bb07indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/sing-mux0.2.1-0.20240124034317-9bfb33698bb6indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/sing-shadowtls0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/smux0.0.0-20230312102458-337ec2a5af37indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/smux0.0.0-20231208180855-7041f6ea79e7indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/tfo-go0.0.0-20230816093905-5a5c285d44a6indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/utls0.0.0-20230309024959-6732c2ab36f2indirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/wireguard-go0.0.0-20230807125731-5d4a7ef2dc5findirect
Gogithub.com/sagernet/wireguard-go0.0.0-20231209092712-9a439356a62eindirect
Gogithub.com/samber/lo1.38.1indirect
Gogithub.com/samber/lo1.39.0indirect
Gogithub.com/scjalliance/comshim0.0.0-20230315213746-5e51f40bd3b9indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v33.23.10indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v33.24.4indirect
Gogithub.com/shoenig/go-m1cpu0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/sina-ghaderi/poly13050.0.0-20220724002748-c5926b03988bindirect
Gogithub.com/sina-ghaderi/rabaead0.0.0-20220730151906-ab6e06b96e8cindirect
Gogithub.com/sina-ghaderi/rabbitio0.0.0-20220730151941-9ce26f4f872eindirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconf0.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpus0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/u-root/uio0.0.0-20230220225925-ffce2a382923indirect
Gogithub.com/vishvananda/netns0.0.0-20211101163701-50045581ed74indirect
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v22.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/yawning/aez0.0.0-20211027044916-e49e68abd344indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi1.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/zhangyunhao116/fastrand0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zhangyunhao116/fastrand0.4.0indirect
Gogitlab.com/yawning/bsaes.git0.0.0-20190805113838-0a714cd429ecindirect
Gogo.uber.org/automaxprocs1.5.3indirect
Gogo.uber.org/mock0.3.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/mock0.4.0indirect
Gogo4.org/netipx0.0.0-20230824141953-6213f710f925indirect
Gogo4.org/netipx0.0.0-20231129151722-fdeea329fbbaindirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.16.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20231110203233-9a3e6036ecaaindirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20240506185415-9bf2ced13842indirect
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.14.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.25.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.5.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.7.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.14.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.3.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.5.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.21.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.31.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.34.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Golukechampine.com/blake31.2.1indirect
Golukechampine.com/blake31.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:mihomo@3.6.0 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.