Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 08:32 UTC

MicahParks / jwkset

A JWK and JWK Set implementation. An auto-caching JWK Set HTTP client is provided. Generate, validate, and inspect JWKs. Self-host this project's website: https://jwkset.com

Go · Go TemplateApache-2.0★ 93 stars⑂ 24 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

MicahParks/jwkset holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (44/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Micah ParksPersonal account
37 followers23 public repossince May 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/MicahParks/jwksetv0.11.3-4849 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
9/18Commit volume9 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year9
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases19 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 49 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~63.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count19
latest_release_tagv0.11.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases63.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.9/60Stars93 stars
11.3/25Forks24 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks24
stars93
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicespkg.go.dev
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.877
How it's scored
40.4/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance39/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues1
closed_issues26
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.963
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.4/25Owner reach37 followers of MicahParks
22.1/25Track record23 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMicahParks
public_repos23
account_age_days2,305
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 49 days ago
20/20Version history48 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/MicahParks/jwkset
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://jwkset.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjwk, jwks, jwks-endpoint, jwks-rsa, jwkset, go, golang, rfc7517
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://jwkset.com
docs_sitehttps://jwkset.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages84
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 84 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.7/40Legible commit history37 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.37
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapexamples/storage_operations/go.mod, go.mod, website/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsexamples/storage_operations/go.mod, go.mod, website/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/45 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes40,510
source_files_sampled45
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

93GitHub stars
8contributors
9commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
19releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 24 ⇿
0Stars
24Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242412023-092025-032026-08
Major 0Minor 8Patch 9

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 08:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/MicahParks/jsontypev0.6.1website/go.mod
Gogithub.com/MicahParks/jwksetv0.11.3website/go.mod
Gogithub.com/MicahParks/recaptchav0.0.5website/go.mod
Gogithub.com/MicahParks/templaterv0.0.3website/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0website/go.mod
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/micahparks/jsontypev0.6.1direct
Gogithub.com/micahparks/jwksetv0.11.3direct
Gogithub.com/micahparks/recaptchav0.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/micahparks/templaterv0.0.3direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.14.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.9.0direct
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/aspect-ratio0.4.2indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.20indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg5.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcamelcase-css2.0.1indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdidyoumean1.2.2indirect
npmdlv1.1.3indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.20.1indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.2indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjiti1.21.7indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-hash3.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpostcss-import15.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-js4.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-nested6.2.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.1.4indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.2indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsucrase3.35.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtailwindcss3.4.19indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 84 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.