Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-01 12:19 UTC

Mid-D-Man / DixScript-Rust

Config, code, and encryption in one `.mdix` file. Monorepo for the DixScript compiler: dixscript (Rust core, on crates.io), mdix-cli, mdix-lsp, and FFI bindings for C#, Go, Python, WASM, and C.

Rust · C#MIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#config#data-format#cli#compiler#compression#data-formats#dsl#encryption#ffi#gamedev#language-server#parser#rust#serialization#unity

Mid-D-Man/DixScript-Rust holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AbdulHamid Mamman Suleiman Personal account
41 followers57 public repossince Nov 2021MidManStudio

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodixscript1.0.02,03415 days agogamedevserializationconfigencryptiondata-formatcryptographydata-structuresencodingparser-implementations

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 3,915 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year3,915
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagdixscript-v1.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate
How it's scored
44.1/80Monthly downloads — 2,034 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdixscript
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads6,103
monthly_downloads2,034
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.544

Issue & PR responsiveness

34At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.7/25Owner reach — 41 followers of Mid-D-Man
22.3/25Track record — 57 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers41
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginMid-D-Man
public_repos57
account_age_days1,725
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

84Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdixscript
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 27 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://DixScript-Docs.pages.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsconfig, data-format, cli, compiler, compression, data-formats, dsl, encryption, ffi, gamedev, language-server, parser, rust, serialization, unity
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://DixScript-Docs.pages.dev
docs_sitehttps://DixScript-Docs.pages.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

31At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, dixscript/Cargo.toml, dixscript/fuzz/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — mdix-npm/tsconfig.json, mdix-vscode/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsmdix-npm/tsconfig.json, mdix-vscode/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, dixscript/Cargo.toml, dixscript/fuzz/Cargo.toml, mdix-cli/Cargo.toml, mdix-csharp/src/MidManStudio.Mdix.Core/MidManStudio.Mdix.Core.csproj, mdix-csharp/tests/MidManStudio.Mdix.Core.Tests/MidManStudio.Mdix.Core.Tests.csproj, mdix-ffi/Cargo.toml, mdix-go/go.mod, mdix-intellij/build.gradle.kts, mdix-java/Cargo.toml, mdix-java/build.gradle.kts, mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml, mdix-lua/Cargo.toml, mdix-python/Cargo.toml, mdix-vsmac/MdixAddin.csproj, mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 11/493 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes125,129
source_files_sampled493
oversized_source_files11

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
3,915commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/Mid-D-Man/dixscript-go' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-cli' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-ffi' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-lsp' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-lua' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-java' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'mdix-wasm' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 12:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 75
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmcom.midmanstudio.mdix2.0.0com.midmanstudio.mdix.localization/package.json
npmcom.midmanstudio.mdix1.0.0com.midmanstudio.mdix.webgl/package.json
crates.iorand0.8dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.0dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioweb-time1.1dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags2.4dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.11dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2.7dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.21dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.13dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iolazy_static1.4dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicase2.7dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-hash2.0dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-gcm0.10dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iochacha20poly13050.10dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioargon20.5dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iobzip20.6dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iolzma-rust20.16dixscript/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete4mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iocolored2.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.21mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs5.0mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.17mdix-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-ffi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-ffi/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4mdix-ffi/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-java/Cargo.toml
crates.iojni0.21mdix-java/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-java/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-lsp0.20mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.21mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-appender0.2mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich6mdix-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-lua/Cargo.toml
crates.iomlua0.10mdix-lua/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-lua/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4mdix-lua/Cargo.toml
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.21mdix-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3mdix-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4mdix-python/Cargo.toml
npmvscode-languageclient^9.0.1mdix-vscode/package.json
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioMac.Sdk17.5.0mdix-vsmac/MdixAddin.csproj
crates.iodixscript1.0.0mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys0.3mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole_error_panic_hook0.1mdix-wasm/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Mid-D-Man/DixScript-Rust. Read them side by side →

98apache/foryA blazingly fast multi-language serialization framework for idiomatic domain objects, schema IDL, and cross-language data exchange.Exceptional98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional97wasmerio/wasmer🚀 Fast, secure, lightweight containers based on WebAssemblyExceptional98zama-ai/tfhe-rsTFHE-rs: A Pure Rust implementation of the TFHE Scheme for Boolean and Integer Arithmetics Over Encrypted Data.Exceptional97swc-project/swcRust-based platform for the WebExceptional96apache/avro-rsRust SDK for Apache Avro - a data serialization system.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.