Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 09:47 UTC

MintPlayer / MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Tools

XML-sitemap - OpenSearch - and other tools for ASP.NET Core webapps

C#Apache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#opensearch#xml-sitemap#must-change-password#well-known-change-password

MintPlayer/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Tools holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (66/100) and lowest on Vitality (30/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MintPlayerOrganization · verified domain
9 followers21 public repossince Mar 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMintPlayer.Timestamps10.0.0-9287 days agoasp.netcorexml-sitemap
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.Hsts11.0.0-70 days agoasp.netcorehstsstrict-transport-securitymiddlewaresecurity
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.NoSniff11.0.0-90 days agoasp.netcorenosniffx-content-type-optionsmiddlewaresecurity
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints11.0.0-20 days agoasp.netcoreendpointsminimalapi
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch11.0.0-130 days agoasp.netcoreopensearch
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml11.0.0-310 days agoasp.netcorexml-sitemap
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.LoggerProviders11.0.0-60 days agoasp.netcoreloggingloggerproviderfile
NuGetMintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword11.0.0-60 days agoasp.netcorechangepasswordwell-knownendpointmanager

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18Commit volume — 8 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year8
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
51.8/80Total downloads — 97,028 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMintPlayer.Timestamps, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Hsts, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.NoSniff, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.LoggerProviders, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads97,028
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance — 20/21 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues0
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

79Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of MintPlayer
21.8/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginMintPlayer
public_repos21
account_age_days2,717

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 31 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMintPlayer.Timestamps, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Hsts, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.NoSniff, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.LoggerProviders, MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopensearch, xml-sitemap, must-change-password, well-known-change-password
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 8 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.3/40Legible commit history — 20 of 32 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.625
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — ChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Abstractions/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Abstractions.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 32 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.125
toolchain_manifestsChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.ChangePassword.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Abstractions/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Abstractions.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.TestApp/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.TestApp.csproj, Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.csproj, Hsts/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Hsts/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Hsts.csproj, Logging/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.LoggerProviders/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.LoggerProviders.csproj, MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword.Abstractions/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword.Abstractions.csproj, MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword.csproj, NoSniff/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.NoSniff/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.NoSniff.csproj, OpenSearch/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch.Abstractions/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch.Abstractions.csproj, OpenSearch/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.OpenSearch.csproj, SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml.Abstractions/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml.Abstractions.csproj, SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml.csproj, SitemapXml/MintPlayer.Timestamps/MintPlayer.Timestamps.csproj, SubDirectoryViews/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SubDirectoryViews/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SubDirectoryViews.csproj, Tests/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator.Tests/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator.Tests.csproj, Tests/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Tools.Tests/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Tools.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes29,324
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
8commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 09:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3CI-Tests6 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Tools10.16.0Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.Generator.csproj
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Tools10.16.0Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Endpoints.csproj
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators10.13.0MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword.csproj
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Attributes10.13.0MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.MustChangePassword.csproj
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators10.13.0SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml.csproj
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Attributes10.13.0SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.SitemapXml.csproj
All dependencies 8

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators10.13.0direct
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Attributes10.13.0direct
NuGetMintPlayer.SourceGenerators.Tools10.16.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 8 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with MintPlayer/MintPlayer.AspNetCore.Tools. Read them side by side →

94AzureAD/microsoft-identity-webHelps creating protected web apps and web APIs with Microsoft identity platform and Azure AD B2CExceptional94apache/logging-log4j2Apache Log4j is a versatile, feature-rich, efficient logging API and backend for Java.Exceptional99aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-pythonA developer toolkit to implement Serverless best practices and increase developer velocity.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-typescriptPowertools for AWS is a developer toolkit to implement Serverless best practices and increase developer velocity.Exceptional97JanssenProject/jansThe Janssen Project is a home for open source IAM components, featuring Auth Server (OAuth/OpenID), Agama low-code identity orchestration, and the Cedarling policy decision point. The "Janssen Server" distributions bundle IAM components under one control plane. Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.