Public recordAt Risk
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 01:07 UTC
ModestNerds-Co / rerout-sdks
Rerout SDKs
ModestNerds-Co/rerout-sdks holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (88/100) and lowest on Security (20/100). It was last updated 54 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
33
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
33
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
ModestNerds, CoOrganization
0 followers8 public repossince Jan 2024
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/ModestNerds-Co/rerout-sdks/go | v0.6.0 | - | 5 | 54 days ago | — |
| crates.io | rerout | 0.6.0 | 18 | 5 | 54 days ago | qrreroutsdkshortlinkwebhooksapi-bindings |
| Packagist | rerout/sdkpoints to another repo — not scored | v0.6.0 | 0 | 3 | 54 days ago | sdkurl-shortenerqr-codesshort-linksreroutbranded-links |
| RubyGems | rerout | 0.6.0 | - | 5 | 54 days ago | — |
| PyPI | rerout | 0.6.0 | 49 | 5 | 54 days ago | branded-linksqr-codesreroutshort-linksurl-shortenerwebhooks |
| npm | @rerout/sdk | 0.6.0 | 44 | 5 | 54 days ago | rerouturl-shortenerbranded-linksqr-codeswebhookscloudflare |
| Packagist | rerout/laravelpoints to another repo — not scored | v0.4.1 | 0 | 4 | 54 days ago | laravelwebhooksurl-shortenerqr-codesshort-linksreroutbranded-links |
| PyPI | rerout-django | 0.4.0 | 47 | 4 | 54 days ago | djangoqr-codesreroutshort-linksurl-shortenerwebhooks |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
25
Development activity
41Weak
How it's scored
| 18/36 | Push recency — last push 54 days ago |
| 3.5/36 | Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits |
| 12.2/18 | Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year |
| 7/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 22 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 54 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 5 |
Release discipline
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/27 | Ships releases — no releases published |
| 0/36 | Release recency — no releases |
| 0/27 | Release cadence — no releases |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
27
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 0 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 0 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
How it's scored
| 29.4/80 | Monthly downloads — 158 downloads/month across crates, go, npm, pypi, rubygems |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | github.com/ModestNerds-Co/rerout-sdks/go, rerout, rerout, rerout, @rerout/sdk, rerout-django |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | crates, go, npm, pypi, rubygems |
| total_downloads | 1,255 |
| monthly_downloads | 158 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
51
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
13Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 0/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| 1.4/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 1 contributors |
| 3/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 1 |
| top_contributor_share | 1 |
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 30/30 | PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 1 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 0 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
42Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 0/25 | Owner reach — 0 followers of ModestNerds-Co |
| 12.2/25 | Track record — 8 public repos, account ~2 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 0 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | ModestNerds-Co |
| public_repos | 8 |
| account_age_days | 958 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on crates, go, npm, pypi, rubygems |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 5 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | github.com/ModestNerds-Co/rerout-sdks/go, rerout, rerout, rerout, @rerout/sdk, rerout-django |
| ecosystems | crates, go, npm, pypi, rubygems |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 54 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
50
Engineering practices
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, .rubocop.yml, phpstan.neon, python-django/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
65Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/rerout |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | https://docs.rs/rerout |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
20
Security posture
20At Risk
How it's scored
| 5.2/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0.8/2.5 | Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 5.2/7.5 | Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 13 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 5 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
88
Agent context & guidance
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 22 of 22 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 8,354 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — dotnet-aspnet/src/Rerout.AspNetCore/Rerout.AspNetCore.csproj, dotnet-aspnet/tests/Rerout.AspNetCore.Tests/Rerout.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj, dotnet/src/Rerout/Rerout.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, .rubocop.yml, phpstan.neon, python-django/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — python-django/src/rerout_django/py.typed, python/src/rerout/py.typed, typescript/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 22 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json, uv.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | python-django/src/rerout_django/py.typed, python/src/rerout/py.typed, typescript/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0.273 |
| toolchain_manifests | dotnet-aspnet/src/Rerout.AspNetCore/Rerout.AspNetCore.csproj, dotnet-aspnet/tests/Rerout.AspNetCore.Tests/Rerout.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj, dotnet/src/Rerout/Rerout.csproj, dotnet/tests/Rerout.Tests/Rerout.Tests.csproj, go/go.mod, java/build.gradle, kotlin-spring/build.gradle.kts, kotlin/build.gradle.kts, rust/Cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed) |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/342 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Java |
| largest_source_bytes | 40,949 |
| source_files_sampled | 342 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Key facts
0GitHub stars
1contributors
22commits, last 12 months
54days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, Packagist, PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- packagist package 'rerout/sdk' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ModestNerds-Co/rerout-php); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- packagist package 'rerout/laravel' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ModestNerds-Co/rerout-laravel); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.0 / 10
2.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 7 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 3 | Contributors | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 7 | Maintained | 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| n/a | Pinned-Dependencies | no dependencies found |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 10 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 18
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | rerout/sdk | ^0.6 | php-laravel/composer.json |
| Packagist | illuminate/support | ^10.0 || ^11.0 || ^12.0 | php-laravel/composer.json |
| Packagist | illuminate/http | ^10.0 || ^11.0 || ^12.0 | php-laravel/composer.json |
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/guzzle | ^7.12.1 | php/composer.json |
| Packagist | psr/http-message | ^1.0 || ^2.0 | php/composer.json |
| PyPI | rerout | >=0.6,<1.0 | python-django/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django | >=4.2,<6.0 | python-django/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx | >=0.27,<1.0 | python/pyproject.toml |
| RubyGems | rerout | — | ruby-rails/Gemfile |
| crates.io | reqwest | 0.12 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde | 1 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde_json | 1 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | 1 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hmac | 0.12 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha2 | 0.10 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hex | 0.4 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | subtle | 2 | rust/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | url | 2 | rust/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, crates.io, Packagist, RubyGems, PyPI, npm.