Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 19:35 UTC

MosaviJP / relayer

A Nostr relay server framework.

GoUnlicense★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2025forkView on GitHub ↗

MosaviJP/relayer holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (67/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 51 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MosaviOrganization
8 followers14 public repossince Feb 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/MosaviJP/relayer/v2v2.100.1-2751 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 51 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume32 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push51
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases47 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 51 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~82 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv2.100.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release51
mean_days_between_releases82
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Unlicense)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 32 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.311
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.9/25Owner reach8 followers of MosaviJP
11.8/25Track record14 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginMosaviJP
public_repos14
account_age_days590

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 51 days ago
20/20Version history27 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/MosaviJP/relayer/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish51

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

36Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories54
affected_packages7
assessed_packages127
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, moderate 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 127 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapexamples/basic/Makefile, examples/expensive/Makefile, examples/rss-bridge/Makefile, examples/whitelisted/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesexamples/basic/Makefile, examples/expensive/Makefile, examples/rss-bridge/Makefile, examples/whitelisted/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
50.2/55Manageable file sizes2/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes69,969
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
15contributors
32commits, last 12 months
51days since last push
47releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 19:35 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/MosaviJP/eventstorev0.0.0-20260130070125-66e28b16c2bfgo.mod
Gogithub.com/PuerkitoBio/goqueryv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/pebblev1.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/fasthttp/websocketv1.5.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/gobwas/wsv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/grokify/html-strip-tags-gov0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jb55/lnsocket/gov0.0.0-20230807153023-0fad35b1352dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/jmoiron/sqlxv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kelseyhightower/envconfigv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/mmcdole/gofeedv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nbd-wtf/go-nostrv0.51.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/rif/cache2gov1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/corsv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stevelacy/dazv0.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.18.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20250305212735-054e65f0b394go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.10.0go.mod
All dependencies 127

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 108 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/pebblev1.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/fasthttp/websocketv1.5.12direct
Gogithub.com/gobwas/wsv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/grokify/html-strip-tags-gov0.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/jb55/lnsocket/gov0.0.0-20230807153023-0fad35b1352ddirect
Gogithub.com/jmoiron/sqlxv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/kelseyhightower/envconfigv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9direct
Gogithub.com/mmcdole/gofeedv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/mosavijp/eventstorev0.0.0-20260130070125-66e28b16c2bfdirect
Gogithub.com/nbd-wtf/go-nostrv0.51.8direct
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/goqueryv1.10.1direct
Gogithub.com/rif/cache2gov1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/rs/corsv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/stevelacy/dazv0.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.18.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20250305212735-054e65f0b394direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.10.0direct
Gofiatjaf.com/libv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aead/siphashv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/cascadiav1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aquasecurity/esqueryv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcdv0.24.3-0.20240921052913-67b8efd3ba53indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2v2.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcutilv1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcutil/psbtv1.1.10indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhashv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btclogv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btclog/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwalletv0.16.10-0.20241127094224-93c858b2ad63indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/wallet/txauthorv1.3.5indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/wallet/txrulesv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/wallet/txsizesv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/walletdbv1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/wtxmgrv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/go-socksv0.0.0-20170105172521-4720035b7bfdindirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/websocketv0.0.0-20150119174127-31079b680792indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/winsvcv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonicv1.13.2indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonic/loaderv0.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/base64xv0.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/errorsv1.11.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/fifov0.0.0-20240816210425-c5d0cb0b6fc0indirect
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/logtagsv0.0.0-20241215232642-bb51bb14a506indirect
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/redactv1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/tokenbucketv0.0.0-20230807174530-cc333fc44b06indirect
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.13indirect
Gogithub.com/datadog/zstdv1.5.6indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/blake256v1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/lruv1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/elastic/elastic-transport-go/v8v8.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch/v7v7.17.10indirect
Gogithub.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch/v8v8.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/structsv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/getsentry/sentry-gov0.31.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/httpheadv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/poolv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/imvexed/fasturlv0.0.0-20230304231329-4e41488060f3indirect
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flagsv1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jrick/logrotatev1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/kkdai/bstreamv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.2.10indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/prettyv0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lightninglabs/gozmqv0.0.0-20191113021534-d20a764486bfindirect
Gogithub.com/lightninglabs/neutrinov0.16.1-0.20240425105051-602843d34ffdindirect
Gogithub.com/lightninglabs/neutrino/cachev1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lndv0.18.5-beta.rc1indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/clockv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/fnv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/fn/v2v2.0.8indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/queuev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/tickerv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/tlvv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/torv1.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.63indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcdole/goxppv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.20.5indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.62.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v3v3.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/savsgio/gotilsv0.0.0-20240704082632-aef3928b8a38indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/objxv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/syndtr/goleveldbv1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/matchv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/prettyv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asmv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.59.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.34.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.34.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.16.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.12.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.32.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.31.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.5indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 127 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.36.0indirectcritical350.56.0
golang.org/x/netv0.37.0indirectmoderate131.27.0-rc.3
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.0indirectunknown11.18.7
github.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.59.0indirectunknown11.70.0
golang.org/x/modv0.24.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.32.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.23.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.