Public recordCritical
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 02:12 UTC
Mr0grog / yaml-doctor
Identify YAML syntax errors in helpful human terms and [optionally] automatically fix them, with a focus on predicting and identifying the YAML author’s intent.
Mr0grog/yaml-doctor holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (54/100) and lowest on Vitality (15/100). It was last updated 281 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
19
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 37 is calibrated to 31 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Rob BrackettPersonal account
107 followers141 public repossince Apr 2009
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm | yaml-doctor | 0.3.0 | 28 | 4 | 775 days ago | yamllint |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
15
Development activity
4Critical
Abandonment alert
Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it
no human commit in 773 daysautomated commits excludedissues left unansweredOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedcontinuous integration brokenOverall rating: At Risk ceiling
Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.
How abandonment is assessedHow it's scored
| 3.6/36 | Push recency — last push 281 days ago |
| 0/36 | Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits |
| 0/18 | Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 0 |
| human_commit_share | 0.818 |
| days_since_last_push | 281 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 0 |
Release discipline
32At Risk
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 3 releases published |
| 0/36 | Release recency — latest release 775 days ago |
| 5.4/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~947.7 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 3 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.3.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 775 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 947.7 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
29
Popularity & adoption
14Critical
How it's scored
| 13.7/60 | Stars — 8 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 1 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 8 |
| watchers | 1 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
24At Risk
How it's scored
| 19.5/80 | Monthly downloads — 28 downloads/month across npm |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | yaml-doctor |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | npm |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 28 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
45
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
23At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 1.7/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits |
| 2.7/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 2 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 2 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.926 |
How it's scored
| 12.6/42 | Issue resolution — 30% of issues closed |
| 24/30 | PR acceptance — 16/20 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 16 |
| open_issues | 7 |
| closed_issues | 3 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.3 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 4 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 14.6/25 | Owner reach — 107 followers of Mr0grog |
| 25/25 | Track record — 141 public repos, account ~17 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 107 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | Mr0grog |
| public_repos | 141 |
| account_age_days | 6,338 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm |
| 4/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 775 days ago |
| 12/20 | Version history — 4 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | yaml-doctor |
| ecosystems | npm |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 775 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
54
Engineering practices
46Weak
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .eslintrc.yaml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
65Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/yaml-doctor |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://www.npmjs.com/package/yaml-doctor |
| docs_site | https://www.npmjs.com/package/yaml-doctor |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
41
Security posture
26At Risk
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 14 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 4 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 26 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:yaml-doctor@0.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 26 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
47
Agent context & guidance
30At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 29.6/40 | Legible commit history — 15 of 27 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.556 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
57Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .eslintrc.yaml |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 33 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 33 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.182 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
55Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | JavaScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 41,496 |
| source_files_sampled | 14 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Key facts
8GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
281days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
7open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 4 contributing companies or organizations |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| n/a | Pinned-Dependencies | no dependencies found |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 21 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 5
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | chalk | ^4.1.2 | package.json |
| npm | glob | 9.3.5 | package.json |
| npm | js-yaml | ^3.14.1 | package.json |
| npm | lru-cache | 10.3.0 | package.json |
| npm | optionator | ^0.9.1 | package.json |
All dependencies 154
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 146 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | chalk | 4.1.2 | direct |
| npm | glob | 7.2.3 | direct |
| npm | glob | 8.1.0 | direct |
| npm | glob | 9.3.5 | direct |
| npm | js-yaml | 3.14.1 | direct |
| npm | js-yaml | 4.1.0 | direct |
| npm | lru-cache | 10.3.0 | direct |
| npm | optionator | 0.9.4 | direct |
| npm | @eslint-community/eslint-utils | 4.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint-community/regexpp | 4.11.0 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/eslintrc | 2.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/js | 8.57.0 | indirect |
| npm | @humanwhocodes/config-array | 0.11.14 | indirect |
| npm | @humanwhocodes/module-importer | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | @humanwhocodes/object-schema | 2.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | @nodelib/fs.scandir | 2.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @nodelib/fs.stat | 2.0.5 | indirect |
| npm | @nodelib/fs.walk | 1.2.8 | indirect |
| npm | @ungap/structured-clone | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | acorn | 8.12.1 | indirect |
| npm | acorn-jsx | 5.3.2 | indirect |
| npm | ajv | 6.12.6 | indirect |
| npm | ansi-colors | 4.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | ansi-regex | 5.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | ansi-styles | 4.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | anymatch | 3.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | argparse | 1.0.10 | indirect |
| npm | argparse | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | balanced-match | 1.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | binary-extensions | 2.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | brace-expansion | 1.1.11 | indirect |
| npm | brace-expansion | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | braces | 3.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | browser-stdout | 1.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | callsites | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | camelcase | 6.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | chokidar | 3.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | cliui | 7.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | color-convert | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | color-name | 1.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | concat-map | 0.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | cross-spawn | 7.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | debug | 4.3.5 | indirect |
| npm | decamelize | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | deep-is | 0.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | diff | 5.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | doctrine | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | emoji-regex | 8.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | escalade | 3.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | escape-string-regexp | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint | 8.57.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-scope | 7.2.2 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-visitor-keys | 3.4.3 | indirect |
| npm | espree | 9.6.1 | indirect |
| npm | esprima | 4.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | esquery | 1.5.0 | indirect |
| npm | esrecurse | 4.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | estraverse | 5.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | esutils | 2.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | fast-deep-equal | 3.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | fast-json-stable-stringify | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | fast-levenshtein | 2.0.6 | indirect |
| npm | fastq | 1.17.1 | indirect |
| npm | file-entry-cache | 6.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | fill-range | 7.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | find-up | 5.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | flat | 5.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | flat-cache | 3.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | flatted | 3.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | fs.realpath | 1.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | fsevents | 2.3.3 | indirect |
| npm | get-caller-file | 2.0.5 | indirect |
| npm | glob-parent | 5.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | glob-parent | 6.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | globals | 13.24.0 | indirect |
| npm | graphemer | 1.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | has-flag | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | he | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | ignore | 5.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | import-fresh | 3.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | imurmurhash | 0.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | inflight | 1.0.6 | indirect |
| npm | inherits | 2.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | is-binary-path | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | is-extglob | 2.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | is-fullwidth-code-point | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | is-glob | 4.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | is-number | 7.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | is-path-inside | 3.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | is-plain-obj | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | is-unicode-supported | 0.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | isexe | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | json-buffer | 3.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | json-schema-traverse | 0.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | keyv | 4.5.4 | indirect |
| npm | levn | 0.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | locate-path | 6.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | lodash.merge | 4.6.2 | indirect |
| npm | log-symbols | 4.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | minimatch | 3.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | minimatch | 5.1.6 | indirect |
| npm | minimatch | 8.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | minipass | 4.2.8 | indirect |
| npm | minipass | 7.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | mocha | 10.6.0 | indirect |
| npm | ms | 2.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | ms | 2.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | natural-compare | 1.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | normalize-path | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | once | 1.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | p-limit | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | p-locate | 5.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | parent-module | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | path-exists | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | path-is-absolute | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | path-key | 3.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | path-scurry | 1.11.1 | indirect |
| npm | picomatch | 2.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | prelude-ls | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | punycode | 2.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | queue-microtask | 1.2.3 | indirect |
| npm | randombytes | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | readdirp | 3.6.0 | indirect |
| npm | require-directory | 2.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | resolve-from | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | reusify | 1.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | rimraf | 3.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | run-parallel | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | safe-buffer | 5.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | serialize-javascript | 6.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | shebang-command | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | shebang-regex | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | sprintf-js | 1.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | string-width | 4.2.3 | indirect |
| npm | strip-ansi | 6.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | strip-json-comments | 3.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | supports-color | 7.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | supports-color | 8.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | text-table | 0.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | to-regex-range | 5.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | type-check | 0.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | type-fest | 0.20.2 | indirect |
| npm | uri-js | 4.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | which | 2.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | word-wrap | 1.2.5 | indirect |
| npm | workerpool | 6.5.1 | indirect |
| npm | wrap-ansi | 7.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | wrappy | 1.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | y18n | 5.0.8 | indirect |
| npm | yargs | 16.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | yargs-parser | 20.2.9 | indirect |
| npm | yargs-unparser | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | yocto-queue | 0.1.0 | indirect |
Dependency advisories 0
Installing npm:yaml-doctor@0.3.0 pulls in 26 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.