Public record
Software health reportschema 0.29.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-02 17:45 UTC

MrRyanPerson / boogle

Search engine ui built on top of searxng.

Svelte · TypeScriptMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗

MrRyanPerson/boogle holds a health index of 6 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (52/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

6
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

6
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 34 is calibrated to 28 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

RyanPersonal account
2 followers13 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

40Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume53 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year53
human_commit_share0.736
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

25At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
15/30PR acceptance10/20 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach2 followers of MrRyanPerson
15.4/25Track record13 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMrRyanPerson
public_repos13
account_age_days1,290
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://boogle.ryan-he.org
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://boogle.ryan-he.org
docs_sitehttps://boogle.ryan-he.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

28At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.2/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier10
security_posture_before_jurisdiction50
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages4
assessed_packages185
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.9/40Legible commit history8 of 39 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.205
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 53
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 53 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.189
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeSvelte with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/6 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageSvelte
largest_source_bytes2,336
source_files_sampled6
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
53commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 17:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1CI-Tests1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.34.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs29.0.2indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-json6.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-replace6.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.3.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/acorn-typescript1.0.10indirect
npm@sveltejs/adapter-auto7.0.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/adapter-node5.5.5indirect
npm@sveltejs/enhanced-img0.10.4indirect
npm@sveltejs/kit2.66.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/load-config0.1.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte7.0.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.3.1indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/cookie0.6.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npm@types/trusted-types2.0.7indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.1indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmcookie0.6.0indirect
npmdaisyui5.5.19indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevalue5.8.1indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.21.6indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmesm-env1.2.2indirect
npmesrap2.2.11indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmimagetools-core9.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmis-reference3.0.3indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.13indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmrollup4.60.1indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmset-cookie-parser3.1.0indirect
npmsharp0.34.5indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsvelte5.56.3indirect
npmsvelte-check4.6.0indirect
npmsvelte-lightbox1.1.7indirect
npmsvelte-parse-markup0.1.5indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.1indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvite-imagetools9.0.3indirect
npmvitefu1.1.3indirect
npmzimmerframe1.1.4indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
postcss8.5.15indirecthigh18.5.18
sharp0.34.5indirecthigh10.35.0
@sveltejs/kit2.66.0indirectmoderate22.69.1
cookie0.6.0indirectlow10.7.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.29.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.