Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 16:31 UTC

MrYossu / Pixata.Utilities

A set of possibly useful utilities. Several Nuget packages with Blazor components, as well as a package with some handy C# extension methods

C# · HTMLMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2021View on GitHub ↗

MrYossu/Pixata.Utilities holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

5 followers22 public repossince Dec 2014Pixata

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence25/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume406 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year406
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year25
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv12.3.15
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 92% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.915
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
20/30PR acceptance6/9 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
5.6/25Owner reach5 followers of MrYossu
21.9/25Track record22 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMrYossu
public_repos22
account_age_days4,235
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://github.com/MrYossu/Pixata.Utilities
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsblazor, c-sharp, extension-methods
has_wikino
homepagehttps://github.com/MrYossu/Pixata.Utilities
docs_sitehttps://github.com/MrYossu/Pixata.Utilities
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,596
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes56,015
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
4contributors
406commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 16:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 45
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluentValidation12.1.1Pixata.AspNetCore/Pixata.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetFluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensions12.1.1Pixata.AspNetCore/Pixata.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetHaukcode.WkHtmlToPdfDotNet1.5.95Pixata.AspNetCore/Pixata.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.22Pixata.AspNetCore/Pixata.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational8.0.22Pixata.AspNetCore/Pixata.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.9Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents/Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.CodeGen4.4.8Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents/Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents.csproj
NuGetCodeGeneration.Roslyn.BuildTime0.6.1Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents/Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents/Pixata.Blazor.LanguageExtComponents.csproj
NuGetBlazored.FluentValidation2.2.0Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.9Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetMailKit4.16.0Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authorization8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetTelerik.Licensing1.8.2Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetTelerik.UI.for.Blazor12.3.0Pixata.Blazor.Sample/Pixata.Blazor.Sample.csproj
NuGetBlazored.LocalStorage4.5.0Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer8.0.22Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.1.3Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetTelerik.UI.for.Blazor12.3.0Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents/Pixata.Blazor.TelerikComponents.csproj
NuGetBlazored.FluentValidation2.2.0Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetBlazored.LocalStorage4.5.0Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Authorization8.0.22Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web8.0.22Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities8.0.22Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.22Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions8.0.0Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http8.0.0Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Identity.Core8.0.22Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json.Bson1.0.3Pixata.Blazor/Pixata.Blazor.csproj
NuGetMailKit4.16.0Pixata.Email/Pixata.Email.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.7.2Pixata.Extensions.Tests/Pixata.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.1.1Pixata.Extensions.Tests/Pixata.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.1.1Pixata.Extensions.Tests/Pixata.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.0Pixata.Extensions.Tests/Pixata.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.12Pixata.Extensions/Pixata.Extensions.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.6Pixata.Functional/Pixata.Functional.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.CodeGen4.4.6Pixata.Functional/Pixata.Functional.csproj
NuGetCodeGeneration.Roslyn.BuildTime0.6.1Pixata.Functional/Pixata.Functional.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Apis.Auth.AspNetCore31.62.1Pixata.Google/Pixata.Google.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Apis.Drive.v31.62.0.3155Pixata.Google/Pixata.Google.csproj
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.6Pixata.Google/Pixata.Google.csproj
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBlazored.FluentValidation2.2.0direct
NuGetBlazored.LocalStorage4.5.0direct
NuGetCodeGeneration.Roslyn.BuildTime0.6.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.0direct
NuGetFluentValidation12.1.1direct
NuGetFluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensions12.1.1direct
NuGetGoogle.Apis.Auth.AspNetCore31.62.1direct
NuGetGoogle.Apis.Drive.v31.62.0.3155direct
NuGetHaukcode.WkHtmlToPdfDotNet1.5.95direct
NuGetLanguageExt.CodeGen4.4.6direct
NuGetLanguageExt.CodeGen4.4.8direct
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.6direct
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.9direct
NuGetMailKit4.16.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authorization8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Authorization8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.1.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Identity.Core8.0.22direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.7.2direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.1.1direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.1.1direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json.Bson1.0.3direct
NuGetTelerik.Licensing1.8.2direct
NuGetTelerik.UI.for.Blazor12.3.0direct
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.