Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 14:07 UTC

MuratDoganer / seer

GoApache-2.0★ 20 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

MuratDoganer/seer holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (50/100) and lowest on Security (27/100). It was last updated 574 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 37 is calibrated to 31 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Murat DoganerPersonal account
3 followers11 public repossince Jul 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/G7DAO/seerpoints to another repo — not scoredv0.4.0-26574 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 574 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push574
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 26 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 574 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv0.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release574
mean_days_between_releases18.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.7/60Stars — 20 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars20
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.479
How it's scored
9.7/42Issue resolution — 23% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 95/98 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs95
open_issues20
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.231
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of MuratDoganer
19.9/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginMuratDoganer
public_repos11
account_age_days2,303
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — go.sum
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum
manifestsgo.mod
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
How it's scored
4.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 5.5.3 (critical 9.8), golang.org/x/crypto 0.23.0 (critical 10.0), github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum 1.14.10 (high 7.5), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
22.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,713 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories103
affected_packages12
assessed_packages72
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 3, moderate 2, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 72 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.7/40Legible commit history — 20 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.2
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
51.8/55Manageable file sizes — 4/68 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes312,737
source_files_sampled68
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — blockchain/arbitrum_one/arbitrum_one_index_types.proto, blockchain/arbitrum_sepolia/arbitrum_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/b3/b3_index_types.proto, blockchain/b3_sepolia/b3_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/ethereum/ethereum_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7/game7_testnet_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7_orbit_arbitrum_sepolia/game7_orbit_arbitrum_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7_testnet/game7_testnet_index_types.proto, blockchain/imx_zkevm/imx_zkevm_index_types.proto, blockchain/imx_zkevm_sepolia/imx_zkevm_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/mantle/mantle_index_types.proto, blockchain/mantle_sepolia/mantle_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/polygon/polygon_index_types.proto, blockchain/ronin/ronin_index_types.proto, blockchain/ronin_saigon/ronin_saigon_index_types.proto, blockchain/sepolia/sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/xai/xai_index_types.proto, blockchain/xai_sepolia/xai_sepolia_index_types.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesblockchain/arbitrum_one/arbitrum_one_index_types.proto, blockchain/arbitrum_sepolia/arbitrum_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/b3/b3_index_types.proto, blockchain/b3_sepolia/b3_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/ethereum/ethereum_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7/game7_testnet_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7_orbit_arbitrum_sepolia/game7_orbit_arbitrum_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/game7_testnet/game7_testnet_index_types.proto, blockchain/imx_zkevm/imx_zkevm_index_types.proto, blockchain/imx_zkevm_sepolia/imx_zkevm_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/mantle/mantle_index_types.proto, blockchain/mantle_sepolia/mantle_sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/polygon/polygon_index_types.proto, blockchain/ronin/ronin_index_types.proto, blockchain/ronin_saigon/ronin_saigon_index_types.proto, blockchain/sepolia/sepolia_index_types.proto, blockchain/xai/xai_index_types.proto, blockchain/xai_sepolia/xai_sepolia_index_types.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

20GitHub stars
5contributors
0commits, last 12 months
574days since last push
26releases
2bus factor
20open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • go package 'github.com/G7DAO/seer' points at a different repository (https://github.com/G7DAO/seer); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/MuratDoganer/seer: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-10-22T14:07:50Z. Please include `E244:3C3A8C:78309C7:AE95466:6ADA18B3` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012024-042024-112025-06
Major 0Minor 3Patch 13

Each point covers 2 days.

Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.39.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.51.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/ethereum/go-ethereumv1.14.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/strcasev0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.8.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.23.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.20.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2dgo.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.167.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.34.2go.mod
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 60 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/storage1.39.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.51.4direct
Gogithub.com/ethereum/go-ethereum1.14.10direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/strcase0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v55.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.8.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.23.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/term0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2ddirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/api0.167.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.34.2direct
Gocloud.google.com/go0.112.1indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute1.24.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata0.2.3indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iam1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/bits-and-blooms/bitset1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v22.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/bugout-dev/bugout-go0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/consensys/bavard0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/consensys/gnark-crypto0.12.1indirect
Gogithub.com/crate-crypto/go-ipa0.0.0-20240223125850-b1e8a79f509cindirect
Gogithub.com/crate-crypto/go-kzg-48441.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/deckarep/golang-set/v22.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v44.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ethereum/c-kzg-48441.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ethereum/go-verkle0.1.1-0.20240829091221-dffa7562dbe9indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-ole1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcache0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-go0.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxy0.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v22.12.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/holiman/uint2561.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfile1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefile0.0.0-20231201235250-de7065d80cb9indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v22.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winio0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcloughlin/addchain0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil3.21.4-0.20210419000835-c7a38de76ee5+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/stackexchange/wmi1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/supranational/blst0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconf0.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpus0.6.1indirect
Gogo.opencensus.io0.24.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc0.48.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp0.48.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.23.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.23.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20231110203233-9a3e6036ecaaindirect
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.25.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.8.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.25.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.5.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20240213162025-012b6fc9bca9indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api0.0.0-20240304161311-37d4d3c04a78indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20240228224816-df926f6c8641indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.62.0indirect
Gorsc.io/tmplfunc0.0.3indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 72 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/jackc/pgx/v55.5.3directcritical85.9.2
golang.org/x/crypto0.23.0directcritical390.56.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.62.0indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum1.14.10directhigh121.17.0
github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto0.12.1indirecthigh20.19.2
golang.org/x/oauth20.17.0indirecthigh20.27.0
github.com/gorilla/websocket1.4.2indirectmoderate21.5.3
golang.org/x/net0.25.0indirectmoderate211.27.2
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.51.4directunknown2—
golang.org/x/mod0.17.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sys0.25.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.18.0indirectunknown20.41.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.