Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-23 10:57 UTC

NVIDIA / cuda-python

CUDA Python: Performance meets Productivity

Cython · PythonApache-2.0★ 3,402 stars⑂ 337 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

NVIDIA/cuda-python holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (78/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

98
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

98
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 87 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NVIDIA CorporationOrganization · verified domain
31,684 followers827 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcuda-core1.2.24,050,870196 days ago
PyPIcuda-python13.4.44,665,392468 days ago
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.8.431,165,829330 days ago
PyPIcuda-bindings13.4.432,255,877298 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,034 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,034
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagcuda-pathfinder-v1.8.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases4.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.3/60Stars — 3,402 stars
21.1/25Forks — 337 forks
9.2/15Watchers — 47 watchers
Inputs used
forks337
stars3,402
watchers47
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 72,137,968 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescuda-core, cuda-python, cuda-pathfinder, cuda-bindings
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads72,137,968
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 77 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled77
top_contributor_share0.243
How it's scored
33.9/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
24.6/30PR acceptance — 1,563/1,907 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs1,563
open_issues219
closed_issues920
prs_merged_7d28
prs_decided_7d35
prs_merged_30d46
prs_decided_30d54
issue_closed_ratio0.808
closed_unmerged_prs344
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 31,684 followers of NVIDIA
25/25Track record — 827 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers31,684
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginNVIDIA
public_repos827
account_age_days5,278

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 46 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescuda-core, cuda-python, cuda-pathfinder, cuda-bindings
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 27 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — cuda_bindings_12/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/
docs_sitehttps://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestscuda_bindings_12/pyproject.toml, cuda_bindings_12/setup.py, cuda_bindings_13/pyproject.toml, cuda_bindings_13/setup.py, cuda_core/pyproject.toml, cuda_core/setup.py, cuda_pathfinder/pyproject.toml, cuda_pathfinder/setup.py, cuda_python/pyproject.toml, cuda_python/setup.py, cuda_python_test_helpers/pyproject.toml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:cuda-python@13.4.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 4 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, benchmarks/cuda_bindings/AGENTS.md, benchmarks/cuda_core/AGENTS.md, cuda_bindings_13/AGENTS.md, cuda_bindings_13/CLAUDE.md, cuda_core/AGENTS.md, cuda_core/CLAUDE.md, cuda_core/tests/AGENTS.md, cuda_pathfinder/AGENTS.md, cuda_pathfinder/CLAUDE.md, cuda_python/AGENTS.md, cuda_python/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, benchmarks/cuda_bindings/AGENTS.md, benchmarks/cuda_core/AGENTS.md, cuda_bindings_13/AGENTS.md, cuda_bindings_13/CLAUDE.md, cuda_core/AGENTS.md, cuda_core/CLAUDE.md, cuda_core/tests/AGENTS.md, cuda_pathfinder/AGENTS.md, cuda_pathfinder/CLAUDE.md, cuda_python/AGENTS.md, cuda_python/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,174
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — cuda_bindings_12/docs/Makefile, cuda_bindings_13/docs/Makefile, cuda_core/docs/Makefile, cuda_pathfinder/docs/Makefile, cuda_python/docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — cuda_bindings_12/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml
11/11Static type checking — cuda_core/cuda/core/py.typed
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 16 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filescuda_bindings_12/docs/Makefile, cuda_bindings_13/docs/Makefile, cuda_core/docs/Makefile, cuda_pathfinder/docs/Makefile, cuda_python/docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscuda_core/cuda/core/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.16
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Cython with type-check config (cuda_core/cuda/core/py.typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 7/494 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCython
largest_source_bytes127,048
source_files_sampled494
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,402GitHub stars
77contributors
1,034commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
219open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'cuda-python-test-helpers' from its registry
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (killed by SIGKILL — most likely the container's memory limit); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 337 ⇿
0Stars
337Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375336232021-082024-032026-10
Major 2Minor 14Patch 30

Each point covers 5 days.

Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcuda-pathfinder~=1.1cuda_bindings_12/pyproject.toml
PyPIcuda-pathfinder>=1.4.2cuda_bindings_13/pyproject.toml
PyPIcuda-pathfinder>=1.4.2cuda_core/pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—cuda_core/pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=24cuda_python_test_helpers/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 52 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcuda-pathfinder—direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPIpackaging—direct
PyPIcffi—indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings—indirect
PyPIcuda-cccl—indirect
PyPIcuda-core—indirect
PyPIcuda-python—indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit—indirect
PyPIcudf-cu13—indirect
PyPIcugraph-cu13—indirect
PyPIcupy-cuda13x—indirect
PyPIcython—indirect
PyPIdask-cuda—indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPImatplotlib—indirect
PyPIml-dtypes—indirect
PyPImpi4py—indirect
PyPInumba-cuda—indirect
PyPInumba-cuda-mlir—indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas—indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cccl-cu12—indirect
PyPInvidia-cudla—indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu12—indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu13—indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft—indirect
PyPInvidia-curand—indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink—indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu12—indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu12—indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu13—indirect
PyPInvmath-python—indirect
PyPInvtx—indirect
PyPIpillow—indirect
PyPIpyclibrary—indirect
PyPIpyglet—indirect
PyPIpyglet2.1.14indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark—indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-github-actions-annotate-failures0.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-randomly4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-repeat0.9.4indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.3indirect
PyPIpytest-run-parallel0.10.0indirect
PyPIpytest-subtests—indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm—indirect
PyPItensorflow—indirect
PyPItorch—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:cuda-python@13.4.4 pulls in 4 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.