Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 18:11 UTC

NativePHP / desktop

Create desktop applications with PHP

PHP · TypeScriptMIT★ 440 stars⑂ 50 forkssince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗

NativePHP/desktop holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (86/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NativePHPOrganization · verified domain
2,801 followers37 public repossince Apr 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnativephp/desktop2.3.012,99585 days agolaraveldesktopnativephpnativephp-laravel

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 193 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year193
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year23
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~46.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tag2.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases46.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.9/60Stars — 440 stars
14.1/25Forks — 50 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks50
stars440
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.9/80Monthly downloads — 12,995 downloads/month across packagist
6/20Registry dependents — 7 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnativephp/desktop
dependents7
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads69,397
monthly_downloads12,995
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 23% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 88 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled88
top_contributor_share0.228
How it's scored
26.7/42Issue resolution — 64% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 78/85 decided PRs merged
12/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 12/13 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs78
open_issues20
closed_issues35
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d17
issue_closed_ratio0.636
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d12
first_time_prs_decided_30d13
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
24.8/25Owner reach — 2,801 followers of NativePHP
18.4/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,801
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginNativePHP
public_repos37
account_age_days1,251

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 8 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnativephp/desktop
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://nativephp.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdesktop-apps, electron, laravel, nativephp, php, nativephp-desktop
has_wikino
homepagehttps://nativephp.com
docs_sitehttps://nativephp.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39/40Legible commit history — 65 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.73
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js, phpstan.neon
11/11Static type checking — resources/electron/electron-plugin/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsresources/electron/electron-plugin/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (resources/electron/electron-plugin/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/264 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes16,660
source_files_sampled264
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

440GitHub stars
88contributors
193commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
8releases
3bus factor
20open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 50 ⇿
0Stars
50Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040505022025-102026-032026-09
Major 0Minor 3Patch 3
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 18:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests23 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained18 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/contracts^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistlaravel/prompts^0.1.1|^0.2|^0.3composer.json
Packagistnativephp/php-bin^1.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.16.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^6.4|^7.2|^8.0composer.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.