Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:57 UTC

NepipenkoIgor / ngx-mask

Angular Plugin to make masks on form fields and html elements.

TypeScriptMIT★ 1,242 stars⑂ 304 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

NepipenkoIgor/ngx-mask holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (52/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Igor NepipenkoPersonal account
109 followers151 public repossince May 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmngx-mask22.1.01,971,87426738 days agong2-maskngx-maskng2angular-maskmaskangularangular2angular2-maskng2mask

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 19 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18Commit volume81 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year81
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases70 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 38 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~39.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count70
latest_release_tagv2.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release38
mean_days_between_releases39.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

91Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.2/60Stars1,242 stars
20.7/25Forks304 forks
7/15Watchers19 watchers
Inputs used
forks304
stars1,242
watchers19
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads1,971,874 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesngx-mask
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,971,874
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 39% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth83 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled83
top_contributor_share0.388
How it's scored
41.8/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance476/616 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs476
open_issues4
closed_issues1,021
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.996
closed_unmerged_prs140
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.7/25Owner reach109 followers of NepipenkoIgor
25/25Track record151 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers109
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginNepipenkoIgor
public_repos151
account_age_days4,474
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 38 days ago
20/20Version history267 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesngx-mask
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish38

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nepipenkoigor.github.io/ngx-mask/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsangular, input-mask, typescript, web, ng, mask, ngx-mask, ngx, decimals, pipe, character, dot-separator, percent, sufix, decimals-enter, eparator, symbol, special-characters, mask-options, input
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://nepipenkoigor.github.io/ngx-mask/
docs_sitehttps://nepipenkoigor.github.io/ngx-mask/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities128 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:ngx-mask@22.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes1/119 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes98,335
source_files_sampled119
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,242GitHub stars
83contributors
81commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
70releases
2bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 304 ⇿
0Stars
304Forks
63Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030029862017-022021-102026-06
Major 1Minor 21Patch 41

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 20:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities128 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@angular/animations22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/common22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/compiler22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/core22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/forms22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser22.0.7package.json
npm@angular/router22.0.7package.json
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.43package.json
npmbrowserslist4.28.6package.json
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001806package.json
npmhighlight.js11.11.1package.json
npmngx-highlightjs14.0.1package.json
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 34 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@angular/animations22.0.7direct
npm@angular/common22.0.7direct
npm@angular/compiler22.0.7direct
npm@angular/core22.0.7direct
npm@angular/forms22.0.7direct
npm@angular/platform-browser22.0.7direct
npm@angular/router22.0.7direct
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.43direct
npmbrowserslist4.28.6direct
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001806direct
npmhighlight.js11.11.1direct
npmngx-highlightjs14.0.1direct
npm@angular-devkit/build-angular22.0.7indirect
npm@angular-eslint/builder22.1.0indirect
npm@angular/cli22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/language-service22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic22.0.7indirect
npm@commitlint/cli21.2.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional21.2.0indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/json2.0.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss4.3.3indirect
npm@types/jest30.0.0indirect
npm@types/node26.1.1indirect
npmangular-eslint22.1.0indirect
npmcypress15.18.1indirect
npmeslint10.7.0indirect
npmglobals17.7.0indirect
npmjsdom29.1.1indirect
npmlint-staged17.1.0indirect
npmng-packagr22.0.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.20indirect
npmpostcss-scss4.0.9indirect
npmprettier3.9.5indirect
npmsemantic-release25.0.8indirect
npmsemantic-release-export-data1.2.0indirect
npmstylelint17.14.1indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended-scss17.0.1indirect
npmstylelint-prettier5.0.3indirect
npmstylelint-scss7.2.0indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtype-coverage2.29.7indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.64.0indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:ngx-mask@22.1.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.