Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 15:30 UTC

NewLifeX / NewLife.IoT

IoT standard library, which defines various communication protocol standards and specifications in the Internet of Things field, without specific implementation. Used for IoT platform construction and unifying various hardware driver protocols. IoT标准库,定义物联网领域的各种通信协议标准规范,不含具体实现。主要用于IoT平台建设,以及统一各种硬件驱动协议。

C#MIT★ 30 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗

NewLifeX/NewLife.IoT holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (75/100) and lowest on Vitality (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

新生命开发团队Organization · verified domain
534 followers97 public repossince Jun 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume — 40 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year20
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.7/60Stars — 30 stars
8.3/25Forks — 11 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars30
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.1/80Total downloads — 104,228 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNewLife.IoT
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads104,228
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.936
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
19.6/25Owner reach — 534 followers of NewLifeX
25/25Track record — 97 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers534
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginNewLifeX
public_repos97
account_age_days3,777

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 78 days ago
20/20Version history — 38 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNewLife.IoT
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish78

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsiot, mqtt
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages29
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 29 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.9/40Legible commit history — 58 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.58
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — AotSmoke/AotSmoke.csproj, NewLife.IoT/NewLife.IoT.csproj, NewLife.IoTDatabase/NewLife.IoTDatabase.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsAotSmoke/AotSmoke.csproj, NewLife.IoT/NewLife.IoT.csproj, NewLife.IoTDatabase/NewLife.IoTDatabase.csproj, NewLife.IoTSerial/NewLife.IoTSerial.csproj, NewLife.IoTSocket/NewLife.IoTSocket.csproj, Test/Test.csproj, XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/119 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes23,570
source_files_sampled119
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

30GitHub stars
3contributors
40commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿
0Stars
11Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121122022-042024-052026-07

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 15:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402NewLife.IoT/NewLife.IoT.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3NewLife.IoT/NewLife.IoT.csproj
NuGetNewLife.Core12.0.2026.1019-beta1413NewLife.IoT/NewLife.IoT.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402NewLife.IoTDatabase/NewLife.IoTDatabase.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3NewLife.IoTDatabase/NewLife.IoTDatabase.csproj
NuGetNewLife.XCode12.2.2026.1019-beta0432NewLife.IoTDatabase/NewLife.IoTDatabase.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402NewLife.IoTSerial/NewLife.IoTSerial.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3NewLife.IoTSerial/NewLife.IoTSerial.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports10.0.10NewLife.IoTSerial/NewLife.IoTSerial.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402NewLife.IoTSocket/NewLife.IoTSocket.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3NewLife.IoTSocket/NewLife.IoTSocket.csproj
NuGetNewLife.Core12.0.2026.1019-beta1413NewLife.IoTSocket/NewLife.IoTSocket.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.10XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetNewLife.PC1.0.2026.609XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetNewLife.Core12.0.2026.1019-beta1413direct
NuGetNewLife.PC1.0.2026.609direct
NuGetNewLife.XCode12.2.2026.1019-beta0432direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports10.0.10direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
NuGetNewLife.BACnet1.1.2026.901indirect
NuGetNewLife.Fatek1.0.2025.805-beta1542indirect
NuGetNewLife.Fuji1.0.2026.212-beta0015indirect
NuGetNewLife.Keyence1.0.2025.528-beta1321indirect
NuGetNewLife.LoRa1.1.2026.302-beta0610indirect
NuGetNewLife.Melsec1.2.2026.501indirect
NuGetNewLife.Modbus2.1.2026.902-beta1359indirect
NuGetNewLife.ModbusRTU2.1.2026.902-beta1359indirect
NuGetNewLife.NetPing1.1.2026.609indirect
NuGetNewLife.Omron1.1.2026.901indirect
NuGetNewLife.OpcDa1.0.2025.1206-beta1835indirect
NuGetNewLife.OpcUa1.0.2025.1206-beta1835indirect
NuGetNewLife.Panasonic1.0.2026.302-beta0619indirect
NuGetNewLife.Schneider1.0.2026.722-beta1216indirect
NuGetNewLife.Siemens1.3.2026.901indirect
NuGetOPCFoundation.NetStandard.Opc.Ua.Client1.5.374.158indirect
NuGetSmartA21.1.2026.211-beta0620indirect
NuGetSmartA41.0.2026.211-beta0621indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 29 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.