Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 07:03 UTC

NightOwl888 / J2N

Java-like Components for .NET

C#Apache-2.0★ 59 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗

NightOwl888/J2N holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Shad StorhaugPersonal account
128 followers135 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume34 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases21 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~218 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv2.2.0-alpha-0053
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases218

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.6/60Stars59 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars59
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
77.6/80Total downloads29,169,120 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesJ2N
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads29,169,120
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.959
How it's scored
30.1/42Issue resolution72% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance119/128 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs119
open_issues19
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.716
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.2/25Owner reach128 followers of NightOwl888
25/25Track record135 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers128
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginNightOwl888
public_repos135
account_age_days5,290
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 687 days ago
12/20Version history2 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesJ2N
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish687

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstext, analysis, bytebuffer, character, atomicinteger, atomiclong, atomicboolean, collections-java, hacktoberfest, linkedhashset, dotnet, java
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.1/40Legible commit history64 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.64
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapeng/GenerateUnicodeData/GenerateUnicodeData.csproj, eng/J2N.Text.CodeGen/J2N.Text.CodeGen.csproj, src/J2N/J2N.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestseng/GenerateUnicodeData/GenerateUnicodeData.csproj, eng/J2N.Text.CodeGen/J2N.Text.CodeGen.csproj, src/J2N/J2N.csproj, tests/J2N.TestUtilities/J2N.TestUtilities.csproj, tests/NUnit/J2N.TestFramework/J2N.TestFramework.csproj, tests/NUnit/J2N.Tests/J2N.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Concurrent.LurchTable.Tests/J2N.Collections.Concurrent.LurchTable.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.Dictionary.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.Dictionary.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.Extensions.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.Extensions.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.HashSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.HashSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.LinkedDictionary.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.LinkedDictionary.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.LinkedHashSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.LinkedHashSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.List.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.List.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.Net5.HashSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.Net5.HashSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.OrderedDictionary.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.OrderedDictionary.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.OrderedHashSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.OrderedHashSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedDictionary.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedDictionary.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedDictionary.TreeSubSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedDictionary.TreeSubSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedSet.TreeSubSet.Tests/J2N.Collections.Generic.SortedSet.TreeSubSet.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Collections.ObjectModel.Tests/J2N.Collections.ObjectModel.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.Runtime.Tests/J2N.Runtime.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.TestCommon/J2N.TestCommon.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.TestUtilities.Xunit.Tests/J2N.TestUtilities.Xunit.Tests.csproj, tests/Xunit/J2N.TestUtilities.Xunit/J2N.TestUtilities.Xunit.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
49.9/55Manageable file sizes61/654 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes1,384,633
source_files_sampled654
oversized_source_files61

Key facts

59GitHub stars
4contributors
34commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
21releases
1bus factor
19open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151312020-032023-042026-06
Major 1Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 07:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained6 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisCSharpPackageReferenceVersion)eng/J2N.Text.CodeGen/J2N.Text.CodeGen.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisCSharpWorkspacesPackageReferenceVersion)eng/J2N.Text.CodeGen/J2N.Text.CodeGen.csproj
NuGetAigamo.ResXGenerator$(AigamoResXGeneratorPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe$(SystemRuntimeCompilerServicesUnsafePackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory$(MicrosoftBclMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory$(SystemMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe$(SystemRuntimeCompilerServicesUnsafePackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory$(MicrosoftBclMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory$(SystemMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetIndexRange$(IndexRangePackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetNetFx.System.Memory$(NetFxSystemMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
NuGetNetFx.System.Memory$(NetFxSystemMemoryPackageReferenceVersion)src/J2N/J2N.csproj
All dependencies 12

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAigamo.ResXGeneratordirect
NuGetIndexRangedirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memorydirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacesdirect
NuGetNetFx.System.Memorydirect
NuGetSystem.Memorydirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafedirect
NuGetNUnitindirect
NuGetRandomizedTesting.Generatorsindirect
NuGetSystem.Buffersindirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePagesindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.