Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 06:39 UTC

NoQuarterTeam / better-translation

Local-first i18n for Vite apps. Mark source copy in React or Svelte, generate flat Locale JSON, and optionally translate with AI.

TypeScriptMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

NoQuarterTeam/better-translation holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

No QuarterOrganization
19 followers19 public repossince May 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmbetter-translation0.6.102,45612129 days agoai-translationi18ninternationalizationlocalizationreactsveltetanstacktranslationtypescriptvitevite-plugin

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume674 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year674
human_commit_share0.18
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases31 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 29 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~2.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagbetter-translation@0.6.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.2/80Monthly downloads2,456 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbetter-translation
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,456
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
29.7/30PR acceptance548/553 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs548
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.4/25Owner reach19 followers of NoQuarterTeam
21.5/25Track record19 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginNoQuarterTeam
public_repos19
account_age_days2,682

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history121 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbetter-translation
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.better-translation.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-translation, i18n, internationalization, localization, react, svelte, tanstack, translation, typescript, vite, vite-plugin
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.better-translation.dev
docs_sitehttps://www.better-translation.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:better-translation@0.6.10 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 31 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.cursor/rules/db-schema-shaping.mdc, .cursor/rules/example-first-development.mdc, .cursor/rules/no-unnecessary-abstractions.mdc, .cursor/rules/route-colocation.mdc, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/db-schema-shaping.mdc, .cursor/rules/example-first-development.mdc, .cursor/rules/no-unnecessary-abstractions.mdc, .cursor/rules/route-colocation.mdc, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,333
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingapps/docs/tsconfig.json, apps/promo-video/tsconfig.json, apps/web/tsconfig.json, examples/svelte-kit/tsconfig.json, examples/tanstack-start/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/bench/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/test/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/tsconfig.json, packages/email/tsconfig.json, packages/locale-editor/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance77 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsapps/docs/tsconfig.json, apps/promo-video/tsconfig.json, apps/web/tsconfig.json, examples/svelte-kit/tsconfig.json, examples/tanstack-start/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/bench/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/test/tsconfig.json, packages/better-translation/tsconfig.json, packages/email/tsconfig.json, packages/locale-editor/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.77
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/242 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes58,305
source_files_sampled242
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
674commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 06:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 72
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@fontsource-variable/inter5.3.0apps/promo-video/package.json
npmreactcatalog:apps/promo-video/package.json
npmreact-domcatalog:apps/promo-video/package.json
npmremotion4.0.513apps/promo-video/package.json
npm@better-translation/emailworkspace:*apps/web/package.json
npm@better-translation/locale-editorworkspace:*apps/web/package.json
npm@better-translation/uiworkspace:*apps/web/package.json
npm@better-upload/client3.0.19apps/web/package.json
npm@better-upload/server3.0.19apps/web/package.json
npm@faker-js/faker10.6.0apps/web/package.json
npm@neondatabase/serverlesscatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@paralleldrive/cuid2^3.3.0apps/web/package.json
npm@posthog/react1.10.3apps/web/package.json
npm@react-email/render^2.1.0apps/web/package.json
npm@sentry/tanstackstart-react10.70.0apps/web/package.json
npm@t3-oss/env-core0.13.11apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/match-sorter-utilscatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/query-db-collectioncatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-dbcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-devtoolscatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-formcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-querycatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-routercatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router-devtoolscatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router-ssr-querycatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-startcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-storecatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-tablecatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/router-plugincatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/storecatalog:apps/web/package.json
npm@vercel/functionscatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmaicatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmbetter-authcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmbetter-translationworkspace:*apps/web/package.json
npmdedent1.7.2apps/web/package.json
npmdrizzle-orm1.0.0-rc.5-ab785fcapps/web/package.json
npmlucide-reactcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmnitrocatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmpg8.23.0apps/web/package.json
npmposthog-js1.418.5apps/web/package.json
npmposthog-node5.49.1apps/web/package.json
npmreactcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmreact-domcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmresend6.20.0apps/web/package.json
npmsonnercatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmsuperjsoncatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmworkflow^4.5.0apps/web/package.json
npmzodcatalog:apps/web/package.json
npmai7.0.70packages/better-translation/package.json
npmoxc-parser0.146.0packages/better-translation/package.json
npmreactcatalog:packages/email/package.json
npmreact-domcatalog:packages/email/package.json
npmreact-email^6.9.1packages/email/package.json
npm@better-translation/uiworkspace:*packages/locale-editor/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-pacercatalog:packages/locale-editor/package.json
npmlucide-reactcatalog:packages/locale-editor/package.json
npmreactcatalog:packages/locale-editor/package.json
npm@base-ui/reactcatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/geist5.3.0packages/ui/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/inter^5.3.0packages/ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authoritycatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmclsxcatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npmlucide-reactcatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmnext-themes^0.4.6packages/ui/package.json
npmreactcatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmshadcn^4.16.0packages/ui/package.json
npmsonnercatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwind-mergecatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwindcsscatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmtw-animate-csscatalog:packages/ui/package.json
npmvaul^1.1.2packages/ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:better-translation@0.6.10 pulls in 31 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.