Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 05:01 UTC

NodeBB / nodebb-plugin-web-push

Push Notifications (via Push API) for NodeBB

JavaScript · Go TemplateMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗

NodeBB/nodebb-plugin-web-push holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NodeBBOrganization

147 followers100 public repossince May 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	nodebb-plugin-web-push	0.9.5	7,349	29	9 days ago	nodebb plugin web-push shell

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
23.5/36	Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18	Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	92
human_commit_share	0.48
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	34

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 31 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~8.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	31
latest_release_tag	v0.9.5
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	9
mean_days_between_releases	8.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 2 stars
6.5/25	Forks — 7 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	7
stars	2
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate

How it's scored

51.6/80	Monthly downloads — 7,349 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	nodebb-plugin-web-push
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	7,349
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

50Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 49% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.487

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good

How it's scored

25.2/42	Issue resolution — 60% of issues closed
28.9/30	PR acceptance — 82/85 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	82
open_issues	2
closed_issues	3
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	0.6
closed_unmerged_prs	3
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	3
first_time_prs_decided_30d	3

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
15.6/25	Owner reach — 147 followers of NodeBB
25/25	Track record — 100 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	147
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	NodeBB
public_repos	100
account_age_days	4,868

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20	Version history — 29 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	nodebb-plugin-web-push
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 16 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	18
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:nodebb-plugin-web-push@0.9.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 18 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.4/40	Legible commit history — 22 of 48 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.458
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc, eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 52 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.52

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	8,528
source_files_sampled	11
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

2GitHub stars

5contributors

92commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

31releases

2bus factor

2open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿

0Stars

7Forks

14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 12

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 05:00 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 4/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	16 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	validator	`^13.12.0`	package.json
npm	web-push	`^3.6.7`	package.json

All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 168 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	validator	`13.15.35`	direct
npm	web-push	`3.6.7`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/cli	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-angular	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-angular-type-enum	`21.0.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-conventional	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-validator	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/ensure	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/execute-rule	`21.0.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/format	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/is-ignored	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/lint	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/load	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/message	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/parse	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/read	`21.2.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/resolve-extends	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/rules	`21.2.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/to-lines	`21.0.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/top-level	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/types	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	@conventional-changelog/git-client	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@conventional-changelog/template	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/balanced-match	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/brace-expansion	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	@simple-libs/child-process-utils	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@simple-libs/stream-utils	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@stylistic/eslint-plugin	`5.10.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.0.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`8.60.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	argue-cli	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	asn1.js	`5.4.1`	indirect
npm	bn.js	`4.12.0`	indirect
npm	buffer-equal-constant-time	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-angular	`9.3.0`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits	`10.2.0`	indirect
npm	conventional-commits-parser	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig-typescript-loader	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	ecdsa-sig-formatter	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	es-toolkit	`1.50.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-nodebb	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.1.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	global-directory	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.3.0`	indirect
npm	http_ece	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.5`	indirect
npm	husky	`9.1.7`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jwa	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jws	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	lint-staged	`17.5.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimalistic-assert	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	string-argv	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`18.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`22.0.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:nodebb-plugin-web-push@0.9.5 pulls in 18 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records