Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 03:39 UTC

Nullify-Platform / cli

Nullify CLI Tool

GoMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

Nullify-Platform/cli holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (76/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 29 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NullifyOrganization
18 followers14 public repossince Aug 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nullify-platform/cliv0.25.3-12029 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 29 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume43 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year43
human_commit_share0.54
days_since_last_push29
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 29 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.25.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases9.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars3
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapi.securityscorecards.dev, github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.681
How it's scored
39/42Issue resolution93% of issues closed
28/30PR acceptance140/150 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs140
open_issues1
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.929
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.2/25Owner reach18 followers of Nullify-Platform
16.8/25Track record14 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginNullify-Platform
public_repos14
account_age_days1,510

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history120 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nullify-platform/cli
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://github.com/Nullify-Platform
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://github.com/Nullify-Platform
docs_sitehttps://github.com/Nullify-Platform
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SASTSAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.2
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: github.com/docker/docker v28.5.2+incompatible (high 7.2)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.9/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 176 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories41
affected_packages10
assessed_packages86
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 3, moderate 3, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 86 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.nullify.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history54 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.nullify.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice27 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance46 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.27
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.46
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
51.6/55Manageable file sizes11/177 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes170,569
source_files_sampled177
oversized_source_files11
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)internal/lib/test/openapi.json, internal/lib/test/openapi.yml
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesinternal/lib/test/openapi.json, internal/lib/test/openapi.yml
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
10contributors
43commits, last 12 months
29days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
72Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-032025-032026-04
Major 0Minor 10Patch 62

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 03:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 11/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.19go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.102.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v85v85.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.54.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nullify-platform/loggerv1.32.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.39.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 73 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.9direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.19direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.102.2direct
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v85v85.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.54.1direct
Gogithub.com/nullify-platform/loggerv1.32.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.39.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-lambda-gov1.52.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.11indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.25indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.25indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.25indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.26indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.18indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.25indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.25indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/snsv1.39.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sqsv1.42.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssmv1.68.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.19indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.36.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.26.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefs/pkgv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/logv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-unitsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystringv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.27.7indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-specv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/atomicwriterv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/termv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aecv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.65.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutmetricv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.40.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.49.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.33.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.9.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260128011058-8636f8732409indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260128011058-8636f8732409indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.78.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogotest.tools/v3v3.5.1indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 86 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.78.0indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatibledirecthigh92.0.0-beta.14
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.40.0indirecthigh21.41.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.40.0indirecthigh31.45.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.40.0indirectmoderate21.43.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.40.0indirectmoderate31.45.0
golang.org/x/netv0.49.0indirectmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.40.0indirectlow11.45.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.40.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.33.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.