Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 22:05 UTC
OXID-eSales / oxideshop_ce
OXID eShop CE component
OXID-eSales/oxideshop_ce holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (22/100). It was last updated today. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.
80
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
OXID eSales AGOrganization · verified domain
53 followers119 public repossince Feb 2013
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-ce | v8.0.0-alpha.2 | 25,030 | 76 | 251 days ago | moduleseshopoxid |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
88
Development activity
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 30.5/36 | Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 231 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 231 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 44 |
Release discipline
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 16.2/27 | Ships releases — 96 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 5 days ago |
| 19.8/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~68.8 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 96 |
| latest_release_tag | v7.5.2 |
| releases_from_tags | yes |
| days_since_latest_release | 5 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 68.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
68
Popularity & adoption
67Good
How it's scored
| 38.5/60 | Stars — 237 stars |
| 19.1/25 | Forks — 195 forks |
| 9.6/15 | Watchers — 55 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 195 |
| stars | 237 |
| watchers | 55 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
How it's scored
| 58.6/80 | Monthly downloads — 25,030 downloads/month across packagist |
| 15/20 | Registry dependents — 177 packages depend on it |
Inputs used
| packages | oxid-esales/oxideshop-ce |
| dependents | 177 |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| total_downloads | 1,272,878 |
| monthly_downloads | 25,030 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
76
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
95Exceptional
How it's scored
| 51.3/54 | Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 19.8/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 12% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 100 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 7 |
| contributors_sampled | 100 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.12 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
28At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 12.4/30 | PR acceptance — 404/976 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 404 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 572 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
88Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 12.5/25 | Owner reach — 53 followers of OXID-eSales |
| 25/25 | Track record — 119 public repos, account ~13 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 53 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | OXID-eSales |
| public_repos | 119 |
| account_age_days | 5,004 |
Package maintenance
91Excellent
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist |
| 26/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 251 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 76 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | oxid-esales/oxideshop-ce |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 251 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
62
Engineering practices
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 3 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
65Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://www.oxid-esales.com/en |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 5 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | oxid-eshop, oxid-esales, php, ecommerce, oxid-eshop-component |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | https://www.oxid-esales.com/en |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
46
Security posture
46Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0.5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1 |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 14 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 4 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
22
Agent context & guidance
3Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 3.2/40 | Legible commit history — 6 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.06 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 1/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
55Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config |
| 54.8/55 | Manageable file sizes — 8/1,826 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | PHP |
| largest_source_bytes | 165,192 |
| source_files_sampled | 1,826 |
| oversized_source_files | 8 |
Key facts
237GitHub stars
100contributors
231commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
96releases
7bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 195 ⇿
0Stars
195Forks
90Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 2Minor 20Patch 59
Each point covers 13 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 15 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 1 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1 |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 28
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | doctrine/collections | ^1.4.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | doctrine/dbal | ^4.2.5 | composer.json |
| Packagist | doctrine/migrations | ^3.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | monolog/monolog | ^1.23.0 | composer.json |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-composer-plugin | dev-b-8.0.x | composer.json |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-db-views-generator | dev-b-8.0.x | composer.json |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-demodata-installer | dev-b-8.0.x | composer.json |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-unified-namespace-generator | dev-b-8.0.x | composer.json |
| Packagist | psr/container | ^1.1.1 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/config | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/console | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/dependency-injection | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/dotenv | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/event-dispatcher | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/expression-language | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/filesystem | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/finder | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/http-foundation | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/html-sanitizer | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/lock | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/mailer | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/mime | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/string | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/yaml | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/http-kernel | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/routing | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/error-handler | ^7.3 | composer.json |
| Packagist | symfony/rate-limiter | ^7.3 | composer.json |
All dependencies 54
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 26 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | doctrine/collections | — | direct |
| Packagist | doctrine/dbal | — | direct |
| Packagist | doctrine/migrations | — | direct |
| Packagist | monolog/monolog | — | direct |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-composer-plugin | — | direct |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-db-views-generator | — | direct |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-demodata-installer | — | direct |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-unified-namespace-generator | — | direct |
| Packagist | psr/container | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/config | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/console | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/dependency-injection | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/dotenv | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/error-handler | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/event-dispatcher | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/expression-language | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/filesystem | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/finder | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/html-sanitizer | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/http-foundation | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/http-kernel | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/lock | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/mailer | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/mime | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/rate-limiter | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/routing | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/string | — | direct |
| Packagist | symfony/yaml | — | direct |
| Packagist | codeception/codeception | — | indirect |
| Packagist | codeception/module-asserts | — | indirect |
| Packagist | codeception/module-db | — | indirect |
| Packagist | codeception/module-filesystem | — | indirect |
| Packagist | codeception/module-webdriver | — | indirect |
| Packagist | composer/composer | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-dom | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-gd | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-iconv | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-json | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-pdo | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-pdo_mysql | — | indirect |
| Packagist | ext-tokenizer | — | indirect |
| Packagist | incenteev/composer-parameter-handler | — | indirect |
| Packagist | mikey179/vfsstream | — | indirect |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/codeception-modules | — | indirect |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/codeception-page-objects | — | indirect |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/developer-tools | — | indirect |
| Packagist | oxid-esales/oxideshop-ide-helper | — | indirect |
| Packagist | php | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpmailer/phpmailer | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpspec/prophecy-phpunit | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/phpunit | — | indirect |
| Packagist | squizlabs/php_codesniffer | — | indirect |
| Packagist | symfony/browser-kit | — | indirect |
| Packagist | symfony/http-client | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories not assessed
Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.