Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 22:19 UTC

Obsidian-TTRPG-Community / dice-roller

Inline dice rolling for Obsidian.md

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 344 stars⑂ 49 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗

Obsidian-TTRPG-Community/dice-roller holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (57/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 575 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Obsidian TTRPG CommunityOrganization

434 followers36 public repossince May 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	@javalent/dice-roller	11.4.2	437	16	575 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 575 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredissues left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 575 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.8
days_since_last_push	575
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

61Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 575 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~20 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	11.4.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	575
mean_days_between_releases	20

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

55Moderate

How it's scored

41.1/60	Stars — 344 stars
14/25	Forks — 49 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	49
stars	344
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

60Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	10
top_contributor_share	0.955

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

31/42	Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 125/138 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	125
open_issues	64
closed_issues	181
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.739
closed_unmerged_prs	13
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
19/25	Owner reach — 434 followers of Obsidian-TTRPG-Community
18.4/25	Track record — 36 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	434
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	Obsidian-TTRPG-Community
public_repos	36
account_age_days	1,266

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 575 days ago
20/20	Version history — 16 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@javalent/dice-roller
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	575

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

26At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 54 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	2.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	66
affected_packages	18
assessed_packages	210
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 7, moderate 8
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 210 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 73 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.912
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/42 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	41,073
source_files_sampled	42
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

344GitHub stars

10contributors

0commits, last 12 months

575days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

64open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 49 ⇿

0Stars

49Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 26Patch 71

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10

2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 22:18 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	54 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 210 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@ampproject/remapping	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/runtime	`7.24.4`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/language	`6.10.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/state	`6.4.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/view	`6.26.3`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	@floating-ui/core	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	@floating-ui/dom	`1.6.3`	indirect
npm	@floating-ui/utils	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	@javalent/components	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@javalent/utilities	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@jest/schemas	`29.6.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/set-array	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.25`	indirect
npm	@lezer/common	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/highlight	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@lezer/lr	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	@popperjs/core	`2.11.8`	indirect
npm	@sinclair/typebox	`0.27.8`	indirect
npm	@sniptt/monads	`0.5.10`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/svelte	`5.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`4.3.14`	indirect
npm	@types/chai-subset	`1.3.5`	indirect
npm	@types/codemirror	`5.60.8`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/he	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/moo	`0.5.9`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`14.18.63`	indirect
npm	@types/pug	`2.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/tern	`0.23.9`	indirect
npm	@types/three	`0.132.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	@yr/monotone-cubic-spline	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.11.3`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	apexcharts	`3.48.0`	indirect
npm	aria-query	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	axobject-query	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	buffer-crc32	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	cannon-es	`0.18.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	check-error	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	code-red	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	compare-versions	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	detect-indent	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	diff-sequences	`29.6.3`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.3.0`	indirect
npm	es6-promise	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.19.12`	indirect
npm	esbuild-svelte	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-copy	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	flowbite	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	flowbite-svelte	`0.45.1`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-func-name	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-reference	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	local-pkg	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	locate-character	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	loupe	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	luxon	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.10`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.0.30`	indirect
npm	min-indent	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	mini-svg-data-uri	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	mlly	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	moment	`2.29.4`	indirect
npm	monkey-around	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	moo	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`5.0.7`	indirect
npm	obsidian	`1.5.7`	indirect
npm	obsidian	`1.5.7-1`	indirect
npm	obsidian-calendar-ui	`0.3.12`	indirect
npm	obsidian-daily-notes-interface	`0.8.4`	indirect
npm	obsidian-dataview	`0.4.25`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	papaparse	`5.4.1`	indirect
npm	parsimmon	`1.18.1`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	pathe	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	pathval	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	periscopic	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.38`	indirect
npm	postcss-load-config	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	preact	`10.20.2`	indirect
npm	pretty-format	`29.7.0`	indirect
npm	random-word-slugs	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	react-is	`18.2.0`	indirect
npm	regenerator-runtime	`0.14.1`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`2.7.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`3.29.5`	indirect
npm	sander	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	sorcery	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.7.0`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	style-mod	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	svelte	`3.35.0`	indirect
npm	svelte	`4.2.15`	indirect
npm	svelte-preprocess	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	svg.draggable.js	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	svg.easing.js	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	svg.filter.js	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	svg.js	`2.7.1`	indirect
npm	svg.pathmorphing.js	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	svg.resize.js	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	svg.select.js	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	svg.select.js	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	tailwind-merge	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	three	`0.137.5`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.4.5`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.5.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`5.28.4`	indirect
npm	vite	`4.5.5`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	vitest	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	w3c-keyname	`2.2.8`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`1.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 18

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 210 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 18 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`3.29.5`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
tinypool	`0.6.0`	indirect	critical	2	`2.1.2`
vitest	`0.33.0`	indirect	critical	1	`4.1.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	8	`5.0.12`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
nanoid	`5.0.7`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.4.38`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
source-map-js	`1.2.0`	indirect	high	1	`1.2.2`
vite	`4.5.5`	indirect	high	16	`8.3.3`
@babel/runtime	`7.24.4`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.0-alpha.17`
esbuild	`0.18.20`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
esbuild	`0.19.12`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
fast-copy	`3.0.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.1.0`
moment	`2.29.4`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.31.0`
svelte	`3.35.0`	indirect	moderate	9	`5.55.7`
svelte	`4.2.15`	indirect	moderate	7	`5.55.7`
yaml	`2.4.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.8.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records