Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:23 UTC

OmniSharp / csharp-language-server-protocol

Language Server Protocol in C#

C#MIT★ 637 stars⑂ 109 forkssince Mar 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindEditor extensionhow this is determined

OmniSharp/csharp-language-server-protocol holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OmniSharpOrganization
347 followers27 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume264 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year264
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases72 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 18 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~207.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count72
latest_release_tagv0.19.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases207.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.5/60Stars637 stars
16.9/25Forks109 forks
6.4/15Watchers15 watchers
Inputs used
forks109
stars637
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth33 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 21 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled33
top_contributor_share0.436
How it's scored
26.1/42Issue resolution62% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance1,220/1,548 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,220
open_issues88
closed_issues145
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.622
closed_unmerged_prs328
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18.3/25Owner reach347 followers of OmniSharp
22.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers347
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginOmniSharp
public_repos27
account_age_days4,282
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslsp, language-server-protocol, language-server, language-client, dotnet, csharp
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingvscode-testextension/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsvscode-testextension/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes2/1,174 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes89,408
source_files_sampled1,174
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

637GitHub stars
33contributors
264commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
72releases
2bus factor
88open issues
npm, NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'atom-testextension' from its registry
  • Could not fetch npm package 'language-client-example' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetGitVersion.Tool.build/.build.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator.build/.build.csproj
NuGetRocket.Surgery.Nuke.build/.build.csproj
npmatom-languageclientgit://github.com/atom/atom-languageclient.gitatom-testextension/package.json
npmvscode-languageclient^9.0.1vscode-testextension/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-protocol^3.17.5vscode-testextension/package.json
All dependencies 192

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 186 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmvscode-languageclient9.0.1direct
npmvscode-languageserver-protocol3.17.5direct
npmvscode-languageserver-protocol3.18.2direct
NuGetGitVersion.Tooldirect
NuGetReportGeneratordirect
NuGetRocket.Surgery.Nukedirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@prettier/plugin-xml3.4.2indirect
npm@types/glob9.0.0indirect
npm@types/mocha10.0.10indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@types/vscode1.125.0indirect
npm@vscode/test-electron3.0.0indirect
npm@xml-tools/parser1.0.11indirect
npmagent-base7.1.1indirect
npmansi-escapes7.0.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchalk5.6.0indirect
npmchevrotain7.1.1indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcli-cursor5.0.0indirect
npmcli-spinners2.9.2indirect
npmcli-truncate5.2.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdiff7.0.0indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.3.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.5.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmenvironment1.1.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeventemitter35.0.4indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.3.1indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.5indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmimmediate3.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point5.1.0indirect
npmis-interactive2.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported1.3.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjszip3.10.1indirect
npmlie3.3.0indirect
npmlint-staged17.0.8indirect
npmlistr210.2.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlog-symbols6.0.0indirect
npmlog-update6.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.0.0indirect
npmmimic-function5.0.1indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch5.1.6indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha11.7.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmonetime7.0.0indirect
npmora8.2.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.0indirect
npmpako1.0.11indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmprettier3.9.5indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.8indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmregexp-to-ast0.5.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrestore-cursor5.1.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.6.2indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.2indirect
npmsetimmediate1.0.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslice-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmslice-ansi8.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstdin-discarder0.2.2indirect
npmstring-argv0.3.2indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring-width7.0.0indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtmp0.2.7indirect
npmtmp-promise3.0.3indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvscode-jsonrpc8.2.0indirect
npmvscode-jsonrpc9.0.1indirect
npmvscode-languageserver-types3.17.5indirect
npmvscode-languageserver-types3.18.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool9.3.4indirect
npmwrap-ansi10.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.12indirect
NuGetDryIoc.Internalindirect
NuGetMediatRindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binderindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjectionindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debugindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensionsindirect
NuGetNerdbank.Streamsindirect
NuGetNerdbank.Streams2.10.72indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonindirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debugindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Fileindirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutableindirect
NuGetSystem.Reactiveindirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Channelsindirect
NuGetVerify.SourceGeneratorsindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.