Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 19:07 UTC

OysteinAmundsen / toolbox

A no-dependency component library for the web

TypeScript · MDXMIT★ 51 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

OysteinAmundsen/toolbox holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (56/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Øystein AmundsenPersonal account
14 followers14 public repossince Dec 2011Bouvet ASA

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,315 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,315
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_taggrid-vue-2.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
27.6/60Stars51 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars51
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63.2/80Monthly downloads54,730 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@toolbox-web/grid, @toolbox-web/grid-vue, @toolbox-web/grid-react, @toolbox-web/grid-angular
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads54,730
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.998
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance307/325 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs307
open_issues6
closed_issues136
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d13
issue_closed_ratio0.958
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.5/25Owner reach14 followers of OysteinAmundsen
20.6/25Track record14 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginOysteinAmundsen
public_repos14
account_age_days5,379
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history159 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@toolbox-web/grid, @toolbox-web/grid-vue, @toolbox-web/grid-react, @toolbox-web/grid-angular
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://toolboxjs.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdata-grid, datagrid, framework-agnostic, no-dependencies, table, typescript, vanilla-js, virtualization, web-components
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://toolboxjs.com/
docs_sitehttps://toolboxjs.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities126 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages54
unassessed_packages40
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 54 resolved dependencies against OSV. 40 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/ai-mode.instructions.md, .github/instructions/css-conventions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/delivery-workflow.instructions.md, .github/instructions/development-principles.instructions.md, .github/instructions/docs-site.instructions.md, .github/instructions/e2e-promo.instructions.md, .github/instructions/e2e-testing.instructions.md, .github/instructions/framework-adapters.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-api.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-architecture.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-pitfalls.instructions.md, .github/instructions/nx-workflow.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing-patterns.instructions.md, .github/instructions/typescript-conventions.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://toolboxjs.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history86 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://toolboxjs.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.966
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/ai-mode.instructions.md, .github/instructions/css-conventions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/delivery-workflow.instructions.md, .github/instructions/development-principles.instructions.md, .github/instructions/docs-site.instructions.md, .github/instructions/e2e-promo.instructions.md, .github/instructions/e2e-testing.instructions.md, .github/instructions/framework-adapters.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-api.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-architecture.instructions.md, .github/instructions/grid-pitfalls.instructions.md, .github/instructions/nx-workflow.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing-patterns.instructions.md, .github/instructions/typescript-conventions.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes28,338
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingapps/docs-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/docs/tsconfig.json, demos/angular/tsconfig.json, demos/react/tsconfig.json, demos/vanilla/tsconfig.json, demos/vue/tsconfig.json, e2e/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-angular/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-react/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-vue/tsconfig.json, libs/grid/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/docs-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/docs/tsconfig.json, demos/angular/tsconfig.json, demos/react/tsconfig.json, demos/vanilla/tsconfig.json, demos/vue/tsconfig.json, e2e/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-angular/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-react/tsconfig.json, libs/grid-vue/tsconfig.json, libs/grid/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes15/890 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes158,191
source_files_sampled890
oversized_source_files15
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesdemos, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, recipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

51GitHub stars
2contributors
1,315commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
6open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@toolbox-web/components' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
87Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412026-042026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 19:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities126 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 94 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@angular-devkit/build-angular22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/build^21.0.4indirect
npm@angular/build^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/build~22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/cli^21.0.4indirect
npm@angular/cli^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/common^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/common^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/core22.0.7indirect
npm@angular/core^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/core^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/forms^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/forms^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/platform-browser^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/platform-browser^22.0.0indirect
npm@angular/router^21.0.0indirect
npm@angular/router^22.0.0indirect
npm@astrojs/cloudflare14.1.4indirect
npm@astrojs/mdx7.0.3indirect
npm@astrojs/starlight0.41.3indirect
npm@axe-core/playwright^4.11.3indirect
npm@custom-elements-manifest/analyzer0.11.0indirect
npm@eslint/js9.39.5indirect
npm@nx/angular23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/devkit23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/eslint23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/eslint-plugin23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/js23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/playwright23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/vite23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/vitest23.1.0indirect
npm@nx/web23.1.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.61.1indirect
npm@swc-node/register1.12.1indirect
npm@swc/core1.15.46indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.23indirect
npm@toolbox-web/grid>=1.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^26.1.1indirect
npm@types/react^19.0.0indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.0.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.3indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^5.1.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.8indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^6.0.3indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/ui4.1.10indirect
npmastro7.1.3indirect
npmastro-mermaid2.1.0indirect
npmconcurrently10.0.3indirect
npmeslint9.39.5indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier10.1.8indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import2.32.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-playwright2.10.5indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react-hooks7.1.1indirect
npmhappy-dom20.11.0indirect
npmjsdom29.1.1indirect
npmjsdom^27.1.0indirect
npmjsonc-eslint-parser3.1.0indirect
npmmermaid11.16.1indirect
npmng-packagr22.0.1indirect
npmnx23.1.0indirect
npmpagefind1.5.2indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmreact^19.0.0indirect
npmreact-dom^19.0.0indirect
npmreact-router-dom7.18.1indirect
npmreact-router-dom^7.1.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-cleanup3.2.1indirect
npmrxjs7.8.2indirect
npmrxjs~7.8.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtslib^2.3.0indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript~5.9.2indirect
npmtypescript~5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.65.0indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
npmvite^7.3.1indirect
npmvite-plugin-dts4.5.4indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmvitest^4.0.8indirect
npmvue3.5.40indirect
npmvue^3.5.0indirect
npmvue^3.5.27indirect
npmvue-router5.2.0indirect
npmvue-router^4.5.0indirect
npmvue-tsc^3.3.8indirect
npmwait-on9.0.10indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 54 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 40 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.