Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-15 05:44 UTC

PHP-CMSIG / seal-opensearch-adapter

An adapter to support Opensearch in CMS-IG SEAL search abstraction. Part of the https://github.com/php-cmsig/search project. READ-ONLY Repository

PHPMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#opensearch#php#seal-adapter#search-client#opensearch-php#seal-php-adapter#cmsig

PHP-CMSIG/seal-opensearch-adapter holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PHP CMSIGOrganization
15 followers20 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcmsig/seal-opensearch-adapter0.12.162,7773379 days agoopensearchsealseal-adaptersearch-clientcmsigcmsig-seal-adapter

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

61Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 33 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 79 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tag0.12.16
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release79
mean_days_between_releases28.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

53Moderate
How it's scored
45.9/80Monthly downloads — 2,777 downloads/month across packagist
6.9/20Registry dependents — 10 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescmsig/seal-opensearch-adapter
dependents10
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads16,483
monthly_downloads2,777
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.915

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of PHP-CMSIG
21.3/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginPHP-CMSIG
public_repos20
account_age_days2,126

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 79 days ago
20/20Version history — 33 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescmsig/seal-opensearch-adapter
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish79

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopensearch, php, seal-adapter, search-client, opensearch-php, seal-php-adapter, cmsig
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

32At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories10
affected_packages3
assessed_packages58
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 58 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 89 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.89
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes11,411
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3GitHub stars
7contributors
21commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-15 05:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcmsig/seal^0.12composer.json
Packagistopensearch-project/opensearch-php^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^1.0 || ^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 58

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 55 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcmsig/seal 0.12-dev.0direct
Packagistopensearch-project/opensearch-php2.6.0direct
Packagistpsr/container 2.0-dev.0direct
Packagistclue/stream-filter 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistezimuel/guzzlestreams4.1.0indirect
Packagistezimuel/ringphp1.4.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7 2.13-dev.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser 5-dev.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-cs-fixer/shim3.95.15indirect
Packagistphp-http/curl-client 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/discovery 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/httplug 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/message 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/promise 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer 1.4-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan 2.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit 10.5-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client 1.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log 3-dev.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistreact/promise 3-dev.0indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.5.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client 7.4-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts3.7-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver 7.4-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php83 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml 7.4-dev.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 58 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
phpunit/phpunit 10.5-dev.0indirecthigh112.5.8
guzzlehttp/psr7 2.13-dev.0indirectmoderate62.12.3
symfony/yaml 7.4-dev.0indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with PHP-CMSIG/seal-opensearch-adapter. Read them side by side →

92opensearch-project/opensearch-phpOfficial PHP Client for OpenSearchExcellent99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional99nextcloud/server☁️ Nextcloud server, a safe home for all your dataExceptional98infection/infectionPHP Mutation Testing libraryExceptional98codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)Exceptional98googleapis/google-cloud-phpGoogle Cloud Client Library for PHPExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.