Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 07:27 UTC

PQCrypta / pqc-binary-format

RustApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗

PQCrypta/pqc-binary-format holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Allan RiddelPersonal account
2 followers13 public repossince Jan 2026PQ Crypta

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iopqc-binary-format2.0.2341621 days agobinary-formatcryptographyencryptionpost-quantumpqcencodingno-std
PyPIpqc_binary_formatpoints to another repo — not scored2.0.22181021 days agocryptographypost-quantumpqcencryptionbinary-format

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume65 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 21 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv2.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
20.6/80Monthly downloads34 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespqc-binary-format
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads298
monthly_downloads34
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

31At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance0/24 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach2 followers of PQCrypta
9.4/25Track record13 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginPQCrypta
public_repos13
account_age_days193
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 21 days ago
20/20Version history16 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespqc-binary-format
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/pqc-binary-format
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/pqc-binary-format
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: pyo3 0.24.2 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages99
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severityhigh 1, low 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 99 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapbindings/c-cpp/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesbindings/c-cpp/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes18,756
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
65commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • pypi package 'pqc_binary_format' points at a different repository (https://github.com/PQCrypta/pqcrypta-community); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 07:27 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.24Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys0.3Cargo.toml
All dependencies 101

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobase640.22.1direct
crates.iojs-sys0.3.83direct
crates.iopyo30.24.2direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen0.6.5direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149direct
crates.iosha20.10.9direct
crates.iothiserror1.0.69direct
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.106direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.10.0indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.1indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.54indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.54indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.6indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocriterion0.5.1indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.iohex0.4.3indirect
crates.ioindoc2.0.7indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.17indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.180indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.6indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.9.1indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.0indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.105indirect
crates.ioproptest1.9.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.24.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.24.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.24.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.24.2indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.43indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorand0.9.2indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.3indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.4.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.11.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.2indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.13indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.8indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.114indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotypenum1.19.0indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.22indirect
crates.iounindent0.2.4indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.1+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.106indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.106indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.106indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.83indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.46.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.33indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.33indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.12indirect
Go../../bindings/go0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000indirect
npmwasm-pack^0.12.0indirect
PyPImaturinindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 99 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pyo30.24.2directhigh40.29.0
rand0.9.2indirectlow20.10.1
crossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirectunknown10.9.20

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io, PyPI.