Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 12:16 UTC

PeiKeSmart / DH.NRemoting

RPC远程过程调用，二进制封装，提供高吞吐低延迟的高性能RPC框架

C#MIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

PeiKeSmart/DH.NRemoting holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (71/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

沛柯(PEKSMART)Organization
8 followers126 public repossince Dec 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetDH.NRemoting.Extensions4.18.2026.210-138199 days agodhdh.nremoting.extensions
NuGetDH.NRemoting4.18.2026.210-588199 days agodhdh.nremoting

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 163 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year163
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

75Good
How it's scored
60.1/80Total downloads — 610,352 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDH.NRemoting.Extensions, DH.NRemoting
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads610,352
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

36Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.9/25Owner reach — 8 followers of PeiKeSmart
20.4/25Track record — 126 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginPeiKeSmart
public_repos126
account_age_days1,353

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 199 days ago
20/20Version history — 588 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDH.NRemoting.Extensions, DH.NRemoting
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish199

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

81Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.3/40Legible commit history — 68 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.68
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,574

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

46Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Benchmark/DH.NRemoting.Benchmarks.csproj, DH.NRemoting.Extensions/DH.NRemoting.Extensions.csproj, DH.NRemoting/DH.NRemoting.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsBenchmark/DH.NRemoting.Benchmarks.csproj, DH.NRemoting.Extensions/DH.NRemoting.Extensions.csproj, DH.NRemoting/DH.NRemoting.csproj, Samples/Demo/Demo.csproj, Samples/IoTZero/IoTZero.csproj, Samples/Zero.Desktop/Zero.Desktop.csproj, Samples/Zero.RpcServer/Zero.RpcServer.csproj, Samples/ZeroServer/ZeroServer.csproj, Test/Test.csproj, XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj, XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/234 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes63,551
source_files_sampled234
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
163commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 12:16 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0DH.NRemoting.Extensions/DH.NRemoting.Extensions.csproj
NuGetDH.NCode4.25.2026.825-beta0535DH.NRemoting.Extensions/DH.NRemoting.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0DH.NRemoting/DH.NRemoting.csproj
NuGetDH.NCore4.25.2026.825-beta0516DH.NRemoting/DH.NRemoting.csproj
NuGetDH.UnitTest4.25.2026.827-beta0613XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.9XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.0XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5XUnitTest.Samples/XUnitTest.Samples.csproj
NuGetDH.UnitTest4.25.2026.827-beta0613XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.9XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.0XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5XUnitTest/XUnitTest.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetDH.NCode4.25.2026.825-beta0535direct
NuGetDH.NCore4.25.2026.825-beta0516direct
NuGetDH.UnitTest4.25.2026.827-beta0613direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetDH.NCube.Core4.22.2026.516-beta1022indirect
NuGetDH.NIoT4.25.2026.827-beta0431indirect
NuGetDH.NMQTT4.24.2026.713-beta1704indirect
NuGetDH.NRedis4.24.2026.714-beta1255indirect
NuGetDH.NStardust4.24.2026.707-beta1531indirect
NuGetDH.NStardust.Extensions4.24.2026.707-beta1531indirect
NuGetSystem.Speech10.0.9indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with PeiKeSmart/DH.NRemoting. Read them side by side →

51PeiKeSmart/DH.NCode数据中间件，支持MySQL、SQLite、SqlServer、Oracle、Postgresql、TDengine、达梦，重点在缓存、性能、分表、自动建表。Moderate51PeiKeSmart/DH.NCoreCore basic components: log (file / network), configuration (XML / JSON / HTTP), cache (memory / redis), network (TCP / UDP / HTTP), RPC framework, serialization (binary / XML / JSON), APM performance tracking. Moderate47PeiKeSmart/DH.NIoTIoT标准库，定义物联网领域的各种通信协议标准规范，不含具体实现。主要用于IoT平台建设，以及统一各种硬件驱动协议。Weak47PeiKeSmart/DH.NAgent应用程序注册为系统服务，支持Windows/LinuxWeak39PeiKeSmart/DH.NBACnetBACnet楼宇自动化Weak100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.