Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 16:44 UTC

PostHog / terraform-provider-posthog

GoMPL-2.0★ 13 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

PostHog/terraform-provider-posthog holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PostHogOrganization · verified domain
2,175 followers376 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/posthog/terraform-providerpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.0.21-284 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 374 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year374
human_commit_share0.78
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 28 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.8 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv1.0.21
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases7.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars13
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.892
How it's scored
36.8/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 115/129 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs115
open_issues4
closed_issues28
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.875
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
24/25Owner reach — 2,175 followers of PostHog
25/25Track record — 376 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,175
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginPostHog
public_repos376
account_age_days2,420

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://registry.terraform.io/providers/posthog/posthog/latest/docs
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsposthog, terraform-provider, iac
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/posthog/posthog/latest/docs
docs_sitehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/posthog/posthog/latest/docs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories80
affected_packages9
assessed_packages114
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 3, moderate 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 114 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 74 of 78 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.949
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/cli/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/samber/lo/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/yuin/goldmark/Makefile, tools/vendor/go.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatter/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, tools/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/cli/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/samber/lo/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/Makefile, tools/vendor/github.com/yuin/goldmark/Makefile, tools/vendor/go.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatter/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, tools/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/136 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes50,037
source_files_sampled136
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_broker.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_controller.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_stdio.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov5/internal/tfplugin5/tfplugin5.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov6/internal/tfplugin6/tfplugin6.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/app_identity/app_identity_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/base/api_base.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/datastore/datastore_v3.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/log/log_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/modules/modules_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/remote_api/remote_api.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesvendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_broker.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_controller.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_stdio.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov5/internal/tfplugin5/tfplugin5.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov6/internal/tfplugin6/tfplugin6.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/app_identity/app_identity_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/base/api_base.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/datastore/datastore_v3.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/log/log_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/modules/modules_service.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/appengine/internal/remote_api/remote_api.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

13GitHub stars
15contributors
374commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
28releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-20: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 13 stars today.
  • go package 'github.com/posthog/terraform-provider' points at a different repository (https://github.com/posthog/terraform-provider); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 13 ★ / 12 ⇿
13Stars
12Forks
20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-20. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

0358101315131212026-012026-052026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 20
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 16:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-jsontypesv0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validatorsv0.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/copywritev0.25.3tools/go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0tools/go.mod
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/copywritev0.25.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-jsontypesv0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validatorsv0.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/alecaivazis/survey/v2v2.3.7indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-radixv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bradleyfalzon/ghinstallation/v2v2.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cli/go-gh/v2v2.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cli/safeexecv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/stringishv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4v4.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v45v45.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v84v84.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystringv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/cliv1.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpointv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-installv0.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutilsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.25.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.3-0.20260213134036-298b8f6b673aindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-addressv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchostv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstringsv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.7.9indirect
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquotev0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51indirect
Gogithub.com/knadh/koanfv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/knadh/koanf/v2v2.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/kunde21/markdownfmt/v3v3.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutilsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v3v3.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.19indirect
Gogithub.com/mergestat/timediffv0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mgutz/ansiv0.0.0-20200706080929-d51e80ef957dindirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/posener/completev1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/thanhpk/randstrv1.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpackv4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.13indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.18.1indirect
Gogo.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatterv0.3.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20251125195548-87e1e737ad39indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.43.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appenginev1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20251202230838-ff82c1b0f217indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.79.3indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 114 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.45.0indirectcritical300.56.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0indirectcritical300.56.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.79.3indirectcritical51.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/netv0.52.0indirectmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
github.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.13indirectunknown11.7.17
golang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.