Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 19:29 UTC

Prismer-AI / Prismer

Open Source Research Claw

TypeScript · JavaScriptCustom license★ 794 stars⑂ 38 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceMCP serverhow this is determined

Prismer-AI/Prismer holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (89/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (45/100). It was last updated 86 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Prismer.AIOrganization
20 followers14 public repossince Mar 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 86 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 111 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year111
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push86
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 199 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.0.1-archive
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release199
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

63Moderate
How it's scored
47/60Stars — 794 stars
13.1/25Forks — 38 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks38
stars794
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges14
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 85% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.846

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
15.3/30PR acceptance — 22/43 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs22
open_issues1
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs21
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of Prismer-AI
11.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginPrismer-AI
public_repos14
account_age_days559

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://prismer.ai
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://prismer.ai
docs_sitehttps://prismer.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

80Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — package-lock.json
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespackage-lock.json
manifestsweb/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configyes

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, docker/config/workspace/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 82 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.965
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, docker/config/workspace/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes22,962

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — docker/plugin/prismer-im/tsconfig.json, docker/plugin/prismer-workspace/tsconfig.json, skills/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 33 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocker/plugin/prismer-im/tsconfig.json, docker/plugin/prismer-workspace/tsconfig.json, skills/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.33
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.15

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 4/451 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,046,214
source_files_sampled451
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

794GitHub stars
4contributors
111commits, last 12 months
86days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 38 ⇿
0Stars
38Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030403862026-012026-052026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@aws-sdk/client-s3^3.1016.0web/package.json
npm@aws-sdk/s3-request-presigner^3.1016.0web/package.json
npm@codemirror/autocomplete^6.20.1web/package.json
npm@codemirror/commands^6.10.3web/package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.12.2web/package.json
npm@codemirror/lint^6.9.5web/package.json
npm@codemirror/search^6.6.0web/package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.5.4web/package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.40.0web/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/core^6.3.1web/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/sortable^10.0.0web/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/utilities^3.2.2web/package.json
npm@jupyterlab/services^7.5.6web/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0web/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0web/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover^1.1.15web/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.2.4web/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.2.8web/package.json
npm@react-three/drei^10.7.7web/package.json
npm@react-three/fiber^9.5.0web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual^3.13.23web/package.json
npm@types/dockerode^4.0.1web/package.json
npm@types/dompurify^3.2.0web/package.json
npm@types/katex^0.16.8web/package.json
npm@types/three^0.183.1web/package.json
npm@types/uuid^11.0.0web/package.json
npm@webcontainer/api^1.6.1web/package.json
npmag-grid-community^35.1.0web/package.json
npmag-grid-react^35.1.0web/package.json
npmaieditor^1.4.2web/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1web/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1web/package.json
npmcodemirror^6.0.2web/package.json
npmcodemirror-lang-latex^0.2.0web/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.1.0web/package.json
npmdockerode^4.0.10web/package.json
npmdompurify^3.3.3web/package.json
npmframer-motion^12.38.0web/package.json
npmimmer^11.1.4web/package.json
npmjszip^3.10.1web/package.json
npmkatex^0.16.42web/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.6.0web/package.json
npmmitt^3.0.1web/package.json
npmnext16.2.1web/package.json
npmopenai^6.32.0web/package.json
npmpdf-parse^2.4.5web/package.json
npmplotly.js-dist-min^3.4.0web/package.json
npmradix-ui^1.4.3web/package.json
npmreact19.2.4web/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.4web/package.json
npmreact-icons^5.5.0web/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0web/package.json
npmreact-pdf^10.4.1web/package.json
npmrehype-highlight^7.0.2web/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1web/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7web/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.5.0web/package.json
npmthree^0.183.2web/package.json
npmuuid^13.0.0web/package.json
npmws^8.20.0web/package.json
npmzod^4.3.6web/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.12web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Prismer-AI/Prismer. Read them side by side →

100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100ionic-team/ionic-frameworkA powerful cross-platform UI toolkit for building native-quality iOS, Android, and Progressive Web Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.Exceptional100nuxt/nuxtThe full-stack Vue framework.Exceptional100go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional100clerk/javascriptOfficial JavaScript repository for Clerk authenticationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.