Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-01 13:11 UTC

QQSHI13 / docsforge

Unified documentation platform combining the ProperDocs engine with an improved Material theme. The stable, long-term MkDocs-Material alternative.

Python · HTMLCustom license★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

QQSHI13/docsforge holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

施清荃Personal account
2 followers29 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdocsforge11.6.1-1310 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume645 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year645
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv11.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases3.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

41Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance12/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs12
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach2 followers of QQSHI13
17.5/25Track record29 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginQQSHI13
public_repos29
account_age_days1,239
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history131 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdocsforge
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://qqshi13.github.io/docsforge/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdocumentation, mkdocs, python, blog, docs, katex, markdown, material-design, material-for-mkdocs, mermaid, mkdocs-alternative, offline-first, open-source, privacy, pwa, self-hosted, site-generator, static-site-generator, technical-documentation, zero-config
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://qqshi13.github.io/docsforge/
docs_sitehttps://qqshi13.github.io/docsforge/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages152
unassessed_packages29
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 152 resolved dependencies against OSV. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history80 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.889
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingpackages/vscode-docsforge/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/vscode-docsforge/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (packages/vscode-docsforge/tsconfig.json)
53.3/55Manageable file sizes4/126 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes677,463
source_files_sampled126
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
645commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'vscode-docsforge' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:docsforge@11.6.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 13:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=7.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIJinja2>=2.11.1packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPImarkupsafe>=2.0.1packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIMarkdown>=3.3.6packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=5.1packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchdog>=2.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPImergedeep>=1.3.4packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml_env_tag>=0.1packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=20.5packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpathspec>=0.11.1packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIplatformdirs>=2.2.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama>=0.4packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymdown-extensions>=10.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIbackrefs>=5.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpaginate>=0.5packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.27packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIbabel>=2.9.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIpygments>=2.16packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIlunr>=0.7packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIcsscompressor>=0.9.5packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIminify-html>=0.18packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
PyPIjsmin>=3.0packages/docsforge/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbabeldirect
PyPIbackrefsdirect
PyPIclickdirect
PyPIcoloramadirect
PyPIcsscompressordirect
PyPIjinja2direct
PyPIjsmindirect
PyPIlunrdirect
PyPImarkdowndirect
PyPImarkupsafedirect
PyPImergedeepdirect
PyPIminify-htmldirect
PyPIpackagingdirect
PyPIpaginatedirect
PyPIpathspecdirect
PyPIplatformdirsdirect
PyPIpygmentsdirect
PyPIpymdown-extensionsdirect
PyPIpyyamldirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tagdirect
PyPIrequestsdirect
PyPIwatchdogdirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.12indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.4indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/mocha10.0.10indirect
npm@types/node26.1.2indirect
npm@types/vscode1.125.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.65.0indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.5indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff9.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals17.8.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.1indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha11.7.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.7indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.65.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmworkerpool9.3.4indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.3indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
PyPIcairosvgindirect
PyPIdocsforgeindirect
PyPIghp-importindirect
PyPIjiebaindirect
PyPIpillowindirect
PyPIplaywrightindirect
PyPIpypdfindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 152 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.