Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 14:30 UTC

Quantinuum / portgraph

Directed graph with first-level ports in Rust.

RustApache-2.0★ 17 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

Quantinuum/portgraph holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Quantinuum LtdOrganization

340 followers206 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	portgraph	0.16.2	27,223	34	8 days ago	data-structure graph data-structures

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

54Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 8 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18	Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	33
human_commit_share	0.62
days_since_last_push	8
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~61.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	16
latest_release_tag	v0.16.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	61.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

29At Risk

How it's scored

19.5/60	Stars — 17 stars
5.8/25	Forks — 6 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	6
stars	17
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

74Good

How it's scored

59.1/80	Monthly downloads — 27,223 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	portgraph
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	528,634
monthly_downloads	27,223
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.682

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

32/42	Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
26.1/30	PR acceptance — 227/261 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	227
open_issues	9
closed_issues	29
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	0.763
closed_unmerged_prs	34
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

73Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
18.2/25	Owner reach — 340 followers of Quantinuum
25/25	Track record — 206 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	340
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	Quantinuum
public_repos	206
account_age_days	3,966

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20	Version history — 34 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	portgraph
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://docs.rs/portgraph
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	graph-algorithms, rust
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://docs.rs/portgraph
docs_site	http://docs.rs/portgraph
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

53Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	5.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

62Moderate

How it's scored

13.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: pyo3 0.28.2 (high 7.5), rand 0.9.2 (low)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 159 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	10
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	167
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, low 1, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 167 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 62 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — justfile
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 38 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	justfile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.38

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/45 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	51,740
source_files_sampled	45
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

17GitHub stars

9contributors

33commits, last 12 months

8days since last push

16releases

1bus factor

9open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿

0Stars

6Forks

13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 10

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10

5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 14:30 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3	Vulnerabilities	7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 11

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	bitvec	`1.0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	proptest	`1.10.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand	`0.9.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	petgraph	`0.8.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	delegate	`0.13.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	itertools	`0.14.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`>= 0.27, < 0.30`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	bitvec	`1.0.1`	direct
crates.io	delegate	`0.13.5`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`0.13.0`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`0.14.0`	direct
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	direct
crates.io	petgraph	`0.8.3`	direct
crates.io	proptest	`1.11.0`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.28.2`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.9.2`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	direct
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.2`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.19`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	alloca	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	anes	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	bincode	`1.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	bit-set	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bit-vec	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	cast	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.58`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-ll	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	console	`0.16.3`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	criterion-plot	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more-impl	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	encode_unicode	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	fixedbitset	`0.5.7`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	funty	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-timer	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	iai-callgrind	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	iai-callgrind-macros	`0.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	iai-callgrind-runner	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	insta	`1.47.2`	indirect
crates.io	inventory	`0.3.23`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.92`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.183`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	oorandom	`11.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	page_size	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	plotters	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-backend	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-svg	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro-crate	`3.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro-error-attr2	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro-error2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.28.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.28.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.28.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.28.2`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	radium	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_xorshift	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.10`	indirect
crates.io	relative-path	`1.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	rmp	`0.8.15`	indirect
crates.io	rmp-serde	`1.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rstest	`0.26.1`	indirect
crates.io	rstest_macros	`0.26.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	rusty-fork	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.27`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	similar	`2.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	tap	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.19`	indirect
crates.io	tinytemplate	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`1.1.0+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.25.8+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_parser	`1.1.0+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	unarray	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	wait-timeout	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.2+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.115`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.115`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.115`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.115`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.92`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wyz	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 167 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pyo3	`0.28.2`	direct	high	4	`0.29.0`
rand	`0.9.2`	direct	low	2	`0.10.1`
anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
bincode	`1.3.3`	indirect	unknown	1	—
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`
proc-macro-error2	`2.0.1`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records