Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 01:07 UTC

Quattio / slackdump

Save or export your private and public Slack messages, threads, files, and users locally without admin privileges.

GoAGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfacehow this is determined

Quattio/slackdump holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 159 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

33
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

33
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

QuattOrganization
17 followers8 public repossince May 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/rusq/slackdump/v4points to another repo — not scoredv4.4.4-1321 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

42Weak
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 159 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 280 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year280
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push159
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

78Good
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recency — latest release 164 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.1.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release164
mean_days_between_releases15
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicespkg.go.dev
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

30At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 24 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.972

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach — 17 followers of Quattio
15.6/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginQuattio
public_repos8
account_age_days1,581

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

35Weak
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

31At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

60Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, internal/chunk/backend/dbase/AGENTS.md, internal/viewer/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.5/40Legible commit history — 29 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.29
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, internal/chunk/backend/dbase/AGENTS.md, internal/viewer/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,986

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

65Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, cmd/slackdump/Makefile, tmp/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, cmd/slackdump/Makefile, tmp/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/601 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes51,250
source_files_sampled601
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
24contributors
280commits, last 12 months
159days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/rusq/slackdump/v4' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rusq/slackdump); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 01:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackaginginternal error: Client.Actions.ListWorkflowRunsByFileName: internal error: ListWorkflowRunsByFileName: GET https://api.github.com/repos/Quattio/slackdump/actions/workflows/docker-build.yml/runs?status=success: 404 Not Found []
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 47
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/MercuryEngineering/CookieMonsterv0.0.0-20180304172713-1584578b3403go.mod
Gogithub.com/ProtonMail/go-cryptov1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/huhv0.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/huh/spinnerv0.0.0-20260223110133-9dc45e34a40bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/enescakir/emojiv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.2.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-rod/rodv0.116.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jmoiron/sqlxv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.44.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/browserv0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/playwright-community/playwright-gov0.5700.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pressly/goose/v3v3.27.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pterm/ptermv0.12.82go.mod
Gogithub.com/refraction-networking/utlsv1.8.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/chttp/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/enciov0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/fsadapterv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/osenv/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/rbubblesv0.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/slackv0.9.6-0.20260212185757-ac5df963acf3go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/slackauthv0.7.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/tagopsv0.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rusq/tracerv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/schollz/progressbar/v3v3.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sosodev/durationv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-emojiv1.0.6go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.6.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.19.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.40.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.34.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.14.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.46.1go.mod
Gosrc.elv.shv0.21.0go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Quattio/slackdump. Read them side by side →

100prometheus/prometheusThe Prometheus monitoring system and time series database.Exceptional100grafana/lokiLike Prometheus, but for logs.Exceptional100stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional100cilium/ciliumeBPF-based Networking, Security, and ObservabilityExceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contribContrib repository for the OpenTelemetry CollectorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.