Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 11:53 UTC

Query-farm / vgi-rpc-rust

Transport-agnostic RPC framework on Apache Arrow IPC — Rust port of vgi-rpc

Rust · HTMLApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

Query-farm/vgi-rpc-rust holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Query.FarmOrganization
118 followers216 public repossince Sep 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iovgi-rpc0.23.32,116300 days agoarrowhttpipcrpcstreamingdata-structuresnetwork-programming
crates.iovgi-rpc-s30.23.3235300 days agoarrows3storagevgi-rpcnetwork-programming
crates.iovgi-rpc-gcs0.23.3173300 days agoarrowgcsstoragevgi-rpcnetwork-programming
crates.iovgi-rpc-client0.23.3193280 days agoarrowclientipcrpcstreamingdata-structuresnetwork-programming
crates.iovgi-rpc-macros0.23.32,038300 days agoarrowmacrosrpcvgi-rpcnetwork-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 147 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year147
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv0.23.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
49/80Monthly downloads — 4,755 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesvgi-rpc, vgi-rpc-s3, vgi-rpc-gcs, vgi-rpc-client, vgi-rpc-macros
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads14,346
monthly_downloads4,755
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.986

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.9/25Owner reach — 118 followers of Query-farm
16.8/25Track record — 216 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers118
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginQuery-farm
public_repos216
account_age_days696

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 30 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesvgi-rpc, vgi-rpc-s3, vgi-rpc-gcs, vgi-rpc-client, vgi-rpc-macros
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/Query-farm/vgi-rpc-rust
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/Query-farm/vgi-rpc-rust
docs_sitehttps://github.com/Query-farm/vgi-rpc-rust
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes26,925

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml, conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 80 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.8
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml, conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml, conformance-worker/Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml, vgi-rpc-gcs/Cargo.toml, vgi-rpc-macros/Cargo.toml, vgi-rpc-s3/Cargo.toml, vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.4/55Manageable file sizes — 5/106 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes341,062
source_files_sampled106
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
147commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'vgi-rpc-benchmark-rust' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'vgi-rpc-conformance-rust' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'vgi-rpc-conformance-client-driver' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:vgi-rpc@0.23.3; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 11:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 88
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iovgi-rpc—benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array—benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema—benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—benchmark-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc-client—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-ipc—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—conformance-client-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc-s3—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-buffer—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-data—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-ipc—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioctrlc3conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—conformance-worker/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc0.23.2vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-ipc—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate2—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—vgi-rpc-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc0.23.2vgi-rpc-gcs/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc-s30.23.2vgi-rpc-gcs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12vgi-rpc-gcs/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1vgi-rpc-gcs/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—vgi-rpc-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—vgi-rpc-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—vgi-rpc-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc0.23.2vgi-rpc-s3/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12vgi-rpc-s3/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1vgi-rpc-s3/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflatbuffers25vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-buffer—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-data—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-ipc—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-select—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-cast—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate2—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iochacha20poly1305—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonwebtoken9.3vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iourlencoding2vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iovgi-rpc-macros0.23.2vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iox509-parser0.16vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iosentry0.48vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
crates.iorust_decimal—vgi-rpc/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Query-farm/vgi-rpc-rust. Read them side by side →

96microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional98apache/opendalApache OpenDAL: One Layer, All Storage.Exceptional96apache/iggyApache Iggy: Hyper-Efficient Message Streaming at Laser SpeedExceptional95eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2Eclipse iceoryx2™ - true zero-copy inter-process-communication with a Rust coreExceptional94huggingface/xet-corexet client tech, used in huggingface_hubExceptional96eclipse-zenoh/zenohzenoh unifies data in motion, data in-use, data at rest and computations. It carefully blends traditional pub/sub with geo-distributed storages, queries and computations, while retaining a level of time and space efficiency that is well beyond any of the mainstream stacks.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.