Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 22:00 UTC

QuiiBz / sherif

Opinionated, zero-config linter for TypeScript & JavaScript monorepos

JavaScriptMIT★ 1,183 stars⑂ 21 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#cli #javascript #linter #monorepo #typescript

QuiiBz/sherif holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 35 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tom LienardPersonal account

638 followers80 public repossince Sep 2018@vercel

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	sherif	1.13.0	1,985,525	36	35 days ago	cli javascript monorepo linter

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

43Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 35 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
12.6/18	Commit volume — 24 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	24
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	35
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 32 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	32
latest_release_tag	v1.13.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	35
mean_days_between_releases	28.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good

How it's scored

49.8/60	Stars — 1,183 stars
10.8/25	Forks — 21 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	21
stars	1,183
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,985,525 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	sherif
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	1,985,525
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	11
top_contributor_share	0.876

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

34.1/42	Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
29.3/30	PR acceptance — 89/91 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	89
open_issues	13
closed_issues	56
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.812
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
20.2/25	Owner reach — 638 followers of QuiiBz
25/25	Track record — 80 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	638
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	QuiiBz
public_repos	80
account_age_days	2,885

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 35 days ago
20/20	Version history — 36 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	sherif
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cli, javascript, linter, monorepo, typescript
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	8
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:sherif@1.13.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

36Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.7/40	Legible commit history — 67 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.67
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

80Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
52.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/24 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,217,698
source_files_sampled	24
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

1,183GitHub stars

11contributors

24commits, last 12 months

35days since last push

32releases

1bus factor

13open issues

crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'sherif' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 21 ⇿

0Stars

21Forks

30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 18Patch 10

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10

3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 22:00 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8	CI-Tests	14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	22 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.75`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`4.5.40`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	colored	`2.0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	detect-indent	`0.1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	detect-newline-style	`0.1.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`2.0.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	inquire	`0.9.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	semver	`1.0.18`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0.188`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.107`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_yaml	`0.9.25`	Cargo.toml
npm	@actions/core	`^1.10.1`	package.json
npm	@actions/exec	`^1.1.1`	package.json
npm	@actions/github	`^6.0.0`	package.json
npm	@actions/tool-cache	`^2.0.1`	package.json

All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 161 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.75`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.5.40`	direct
crates.io	colored	`2.0.4`	direct
crates.io	detect-indent	`0.1.0`	direct
crates.io	detect-newline-style	`0.1.2`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`2.0.0`	direct
crates.io	inquire	`0.9.1`	direct
crates.io	semver	`1.0.18`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.188`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.107`	direct
crates.io	serde_yaml	`0.9.25`	direct
npm	@actions/core	`1.11.1`	direct
npm	@actions/exec	`1.1.1`	direct
npm	@actions/github	`6.0.0`	direct
npm	@actions/tool-cache	`2.0.1`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`0.6.19`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.5.40`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.5.40`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`0.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	console	`0.15.7`	indirect
crates.io	convert_case	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	crossterm	`0.29.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossterm_winapi	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	debugless-unwrap	`0.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more-impl	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	document-features	`0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	dyn-clone	`1.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	encode_unicode	`0.3.6`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fuzzy-matcher	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	insta	`1.32.0`	indirect
crates.io	is-terminal	`0.4.9`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.1`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.177`	indirect
crates.io	linked-hash-map	`0.5.6`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.4.7`	indirect
crates.io	litrs	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.11`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.20`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	mio	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.1`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.9`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.95`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.42`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.10.3`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.5`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`0.38.13`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.188`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook	`0.3.17`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-mio	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	similar	`2.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.110`	indirect
crates.io	thread_local	`1.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.12`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	unsafe-libyaml	`0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.45.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.48.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	yaml-rust	`0.4.5`	indirect
npm	@actions/http-client	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	@actions/io	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`7.8.9`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.8.7`	indirect
npm	@fastify/busboy	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/auth-token	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/core	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/endpoint	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	@octokit/graphql	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`20.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`22.2.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest	`9.2.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods	`10.4.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request	`8.4.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request-error	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`12.6.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`13.6.1`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`20.17.6`	indirect
npm	@vercel/ncc	`0.38.3`	indirect
npm	a	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	b	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	before-after-hook	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	deprecation	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	eslint	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	eslint	`7.8.9`	indirect
npm	next	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	next	`4.5.6`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	react	`*`	indirect
npm	react	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	react	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	react	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	react	`4.5.6`	indirect
npm	semver	`6.3.1`	indirect
npm	sherif-darwin-arm64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-darwin-x64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-linux-arm64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-linux-arm64-musl	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-linux-x64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-linux-x64-musl	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-windows-arm64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	sherif-windows-x64	`1.13.0`	indirect
npm	tunnel	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	turbo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	turbo-ignore	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.6.3`	indirect
npm	undici	`5.28.4`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.19.8`	indirect
npm	universal-user-agent	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	uuid	`3.4.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	x	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	y	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	z	`1.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:sherif@1.13.0 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records