Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 15:07 UTC

ReactiveDomain / reactive-domain

A toolkit for implementing CQRS-ES in a reactive system

C#MIT★ 35 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Oct 2016View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ReactiveDomain/reactive-domain holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ReactiveDomainOrganization

0 followers8 public repossince Jul 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
10.4/36	Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 101 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	101
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	15

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 29 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~19.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	29
latest_release_tag	v0.18.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	19.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

41Weak

How it's scored

24.8/60	Stars — 35 stars
11/25	Forks — 22 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	22
stars	35
watchers	11
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	15
top_contributor_share	0.312

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

32.8/42	Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
24.2/30	PR acceptance — 160/198 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	160
open_issues	19
closed_issues	68
prs_merged_7d	7
prs_decided_7d	7
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	8
issue_closed_ratio	0.782
closed_unmerged_prs	38
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
0/25	Owner reach — 0 followers of ReactiveDomain
18.9/25	Track record — 8 public repos, account ~8 yr old

Inputs used

followers	0
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	ReactiveDomain
public_repos	8
account_age_days	2,989

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak

How it's scored

6/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 13/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

55Moderate

How it's scored

11.8/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: Newtonsoft.Json 10.0.3 (high 7.5), Newtonsoft.Json 9.0.1 (high 7.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
29.1/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,548 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	87
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 2
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 87 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 79 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.79
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,943

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Samples/Metadata/PersistedMetadata/PersistedMetadata.csproj, Samples/Metadata/SimpleMetadata/SimpleMetadata.csproj, Spikes/NullLinkToSpike/NullLinkToSpike.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 46 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.46
toolchain_manifests	Samples/Metadata/PersistedMetadata/PersistedMetadata.csproj, Samples/Metadata/SimpleMetadata/SimpleMetadata.csproj, Spikes/NullLinkToSpike/NullLinkToSpike.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Core/ReactiveDomain.Core.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Persistence/ReactiveDomain.Persistence.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Policy/ReactiveDomain.Policy.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Testing/ReactiveDomain.Testing.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Tools/EventTransformer/EventTransformer.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Tools/Shovel/Shovel.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests.csproj, src/ReactiveDomain.Transport/ReactiveDomain.Transport.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/520 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	73,774
source_files_sampled	520
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

35GitHub stars

15contributors

101commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

29releases

2bus factor

19open issues

—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿

0Stars

22Forks

14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 10

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10

4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 15:07 UTC

8	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5	CI-Tests	9 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 13/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 78

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`22.0.0`	Spikes/NullLinkToSpike/NullLinkToSpike.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	Spikes/NullLinkToSpike/NullLinkToSpike.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp	`5.6.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces	`5.6.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp	`4.8.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers/ReactiveDomain.Analyzers.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Core/ReactiveDomain.Core.csproj
NuGet	System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.Core/ReactiveDomain.Core.csproj
NuGet	System.Reactive	`7.0.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Core/ReactiveDomain.Core.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.csproj
NuGet	System.Reactive	`7.0.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Foundation/ReactiveDomain.Foundation.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	DynamicData	`9.4.33`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	IdentityModel	`4.6.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	IdentityServer4.Storage	`4.1.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.Text.Encodings.Web	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage/ReactiveDomain.IdentityStorage.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp	`5.6.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	System.CodeDom	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json.Bson	`1.0.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	System.Runtime.Loader	`4.3.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.CSharp	`4.7.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.csproj
NuGet	System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.csproj
NuGet	System.Reactive	`7.0.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Messaging/ReactiveDomain.Messaging.csproj
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`22.0.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Persistence/ReactiveDomain.Persistence.csproj
NuGet	KurrentDB.Client	`1.4.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Persistence/ReactiveDomain.Persistence.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Persistence/ReactiveDomain.Persistence.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Policy.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.Tests.csproj
NuGet	DynamicData	`9.4.33`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	IdentityModel	`4.6.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	System.Text.Encodings.Web	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage/ReactiveDomain.PolicyStorage.csproj
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json	`10.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`22.0.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj
NuGet	System.CommandLine	`2.0.10`	src/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool/ReactiveDomain.PolicyTool.csproj
NuGet	KurrentDB.Client	`1.4.0`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Testing.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing/ReactiveDomain.Testing.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.utility	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing/ReactiveDomain.Testing.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Testing/ReactiveDomain.Testing.csproj
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests.csproj
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	src/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	src/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests.csproj
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	src/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests/ReactiveDomain.Transport.Tests.csproj

All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 45 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
NuGet	DynamicData	`9.4.33`	direct
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`21.2.2`	direct
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`22.0.0`	direct
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`3.9.2`	direct
NuGet	EventStore.Client	`4.1.0`	direct
NuGet	IdentityModel	`4.6.0`	direct
NuGet	IdentityServer4.Storage	`4.1.2`	direct
NuGet	KurrentDB.Client	`1.4.0`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp	`4.8.0`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp	`5.6.0`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces	`5.6.0`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.CSharp	`4.7.0`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`18.8.1`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`10.0.3`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.3`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.4`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`9.0.1`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json.Bson	`1.0.1`	direct
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json.Bson	`1.0.3`	direct
NuGet	System.CodeDom	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.CommandLine	`2.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager	`4.5.0`	direct
NuGet	System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices	`10.0.0`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices	`8.0.0`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement	`10.0.0`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement	`8.0.0`	direct
NuGet	System.Reactive	`7.0.0`	direct
NuGet	System.Runtime.Loader	`4.3.0`	direct
NuGet	System.Text.Encodings.Web	`10.0.10`	direct
NuGet	xunit	`2.1`	direct
NuGet	xunit	`2.1.0`	direct
NuGet	xunit	`2.9.3`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.3.1`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.console	`2.9.3`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.utility	`2.9.3`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.1`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.1.0`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.3.1`	direct
NuGet	xunit.runner.visualstudio	`2.8.2`	direct
NuGet	EventStore.Client.Embedded	`4.0.3`	indirect
NuGet	EventStore.ClientAPI.NetCore	`4.1.0.23`	indirect
NuGet	log4net	`2.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.Tpl.Dataflow	`4.5.24`	indirect
NuGet	Nito.AsyncEx.Dataflow	`3.0.0`	indirect
NuGet	Nito.AsyncEx.DataflowProxy	`1.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	NLog	`4.3.10`	indirect
NuGet	NLog	`4.4.12`	indirect
NuGet	NuGet.CommandLine	`3.4.3`	indirect
NuGet	ReactiveDomain	`0.15.3`	indirect
NuGet	ReactiveDomain	`0.18.0`	indirect
NuGet	ReactiveDomain	`0.7`	indirect
NuGet	ReactiveUI	`7.4.0`	indirect
NuGet	reactiveui-core	`6.5.2`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-Core	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-Interfaces	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-Linq	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-Main	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-PlatformServices	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Rx-XAML	`2.2.5`	indirect
NuGet	Splat	`1.6.2`	indirect
NuGet	Terminal.Gui	`1.19.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.abstractions	`2.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.abstractions	`2.0.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.abstractions	`2.0.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.assert	`2.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.assert	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.assert	`2.3.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.assert.source	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.assert.source	`2.3.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.core	`2.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.core	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.core	`2.3.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.core	`2.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.core	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.core	`2.3.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.execution	`2.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.execution	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.extensibility.execution	`2.3.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.runner.msbuild	`2.1`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.runner.msbuild	`2.1.0`	indirect
NuGet	xunit.runner.msbuild	`2.3.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 87 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
log4net	`2.0.7`	indirect	critical	2	`3.3.0`
Newtonsoft.Json	`10.0.3`	direct	high	1	`13.0.1`
Newtonsoft.Json	`9.0.1`	direct	high	1	`13.0.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.