Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 19:13 UTC

SPANDigital / presidium-styling-base

The global default styling for Presidium themes.

SCSSMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗

SPANDigital/presidium-styling-base holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Span DigitalOrganization
22 followers57 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/spandigital/presidium-styling-basev0.14.0-5022 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 22 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence20/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume68 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year68
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases49 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv0.14.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.414
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
21.6/30PR acceptance77/107 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs77
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.8/25Owner reach22 followers of SPANDigital
24.8/25Track record57 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers22
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginSPANDigital
public_repos57
account_age_days4,412

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history50 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/spandigital/presidium-styling-base
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://presidium.spandigital.net/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshugo, presidium, styling, themes
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://presidium.spandigital.net/
docs_sitehttps://presidium.spandigital.net/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories22
affected_packages11
assessed_packages204
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 5, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 204 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://semantic-release.gitbook.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history74 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://semantic-release.gitbook.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.86
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeSCSS without a type-check config
33/55Manageable file sizes4/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageSCSS
largest_source_bytes2,666,963
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

0GitHub stars
13contributors
68commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
49releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 19:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 204 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.22.5indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.22.5indirect
npm@babel/highlight7.22.5indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms3.0.4indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer3.0.3indirect
npm@csstools/media-query-list-parser4.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/selector-specificity5.0.0indirect
npm@dual-bundle/import-meta-resolve4.1.0indirect
npm@keyv/serialize1.0.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npmaggregate-error3.1.0indirect
npmajv8.12.0indirect
npmansi-escapes4.3.2indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmastral-regex2.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match2.0.0indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcacheable1.8.10indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmchalk5.2.0indirect
npmclean-stack2.2.0indirect
npmcli-cursor3.1.0indirect
npmcli-truncate2.1.0indirect
npmcli-truncate3.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolord2.9.3indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcommander10.0.1indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmcss-functions-list3.2.3indirect
npmcss-tree3.1.0indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmexeca7.1.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.3.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.2.12indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache10.0.8indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmflat-cache6.1.8indirect
npmflatted3.3.3indirect
npmget-stream6.0.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobal-modules2.0.0indirect
npmglobal-prefix3.0.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmglobjoin0.1.4indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhookified1.8.1indirect
npmhtml-tags3.3.1indirect
npmhuman-signals4.3.1indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmignore7.0.3indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmindent-string4.0.0indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point4.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object5.0.0indirect
npmis-stream3.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkeyv5.3.2indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmknown-css-properties0.35.0indirect
npmknown-css-properties0.36.0indirect
npmlilconfig2.1.0indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlint-staged13.2.2indirect
npmlistr25.0.8indirect
npmlodash.truncate4.4.2indirect
npmlog-update4.0.0indirect
npmmathml-tag-names2.1.3indirect
npmmdn-data2.12.2indirect
npmmdn-data2.24.0indirect
npmmeow13.2.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmmimic-fn4.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.10indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path5.1.0indirect
npmobject-inspect1.12.3indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmonetime6.0.0indirect
npmp-map4.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-key4.0.0indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpidtree0.6.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.3indirect
npmpostcss-media-query-parser0.2.3indirect
npmpostcss-resolve-nested-selector0.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-resolve-nested-selector0.1.6indirect
npmpostcss-safe-parser7.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-scss4.0.6indirect
npmpostcss-scss4.0.9indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.13indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser7.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprettier3.6.2indirect
npmprettier-linter-helpers1.0.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmrestore-cursor3.1.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrfdc1.3.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmrxjs7.8.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmsignal-exit4.0.2indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmslice-ansi3.0.0indirect
npmslice-ansi4.0.0indirect
npmslice-ansi5.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstring-argv0.3.2indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmstrip-final-newline3.0.0indirect
npmstylelint16.18.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-prettier9.0.5indirect
npmstylelint-config-prettier-scss1.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended12.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended17.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended-scss16.0.1indirect
npmstylelint-config-sass-guidelines10.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard33.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard39.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard-scss16.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-prettier5.0.3indirect
npmstylelint-scss4.7.0indirect
npmstylelint-scss6.12.1indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-hyperlinks3.2.0indirect
npmsvg-tags1.0.0indirect
npmtable6.9.0indirect
npmthrough2.3.8indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.5.3indirect
npmtype-fest0.21.3indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi6.2.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic5.0.1indirect
npmyaml2.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 204 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.3.3indirectcritical23.4.2
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
nanoid3.3.10indirecthigh35.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.5.3indirecthigh48.5.23
ajv8.12.0indirectmoderate18.18.0
colord2.9.3indirectmoderate12.9.4
micromatch4.0.5indirectmoderate14.0.8
postcss-selector-parser7.1.0indirectmoderate17.1.3
yaml2.3.1indirectmoderate12.8.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.