Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-31 17:25 UTC

Sandertv / gophertunnel

General purpose library for Minecraft Bedrock Edition software written in Go

GoMIT★ 549 stars⑂ 166 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗

Sandertv/gophertunnel holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (56/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sander ten VeldhuisPersonal account
224 followers5 public repossince Dec 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sandertv/gophertunnelv1.57.1-24724 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
17.9/18Commit volume97 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year97
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.57.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases18.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.4/60Stars549 stars
18.5/25Forks166 forks
7.2/15Watchers21 watchers
Inputs used
forks166
stars549
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 69% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth45 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled45
top_contributor_share0.689
How it's scored
32.4/42Issue resolution77% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance243/309 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs243
open_issues31
closed_issues105
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.772
closed_unmerged_prs66
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.9/25Owner reach224 followers of Sandertv
17.7/25Track record5 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers224
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSandertv
public_repos5
account_age_days3,894
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 24 days ago
20/20Version history247 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/sandertv/gophertunnel
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests26 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgo, minecraft, client, server, proxy, tools, nbt, auth, protocol, golang, bedrock, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests26 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: golang.org/x/net v0.50.0 (moderate 6.5), github.com/klauspost/compress v1.18.1 (unknown), golang.org/x/text v0.34.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
34.4/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 154 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories50
affected_packages6
assessed_packages36
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 36 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/351 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes60,503
source_files_sampled351
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

549GitHub stars
45contributors
97commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
31open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 166 ⇿
0Stars
166Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016015252019-122023-042026-07
Major 0Minor 38Patch 62

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-31 17:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests26 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.17.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-nethernetv1.0.17go.mod
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-playfabv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-xsapiv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/df-mc/jsoncv1.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-gl/mathglv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-tomlv1.9.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/sandertv/go-raknetv1.14.3-0.20250305181847-6af3e95113d6go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20240909161429-701f63a606c0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.50.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.34.0go.mod
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.17.0direct
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-nethernetv1.0.17direct
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-playfabv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-xsapiv1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/df-mc/jsoncv1.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/go-gl/mathglv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.1direct
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-tomlv1.9.5direct
Gogithub.com/sandertv/go-raknetv1.14.3-0.20250305181847-6af3e95113d6direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20240909161429-701f63a606c0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.50.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.28.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.34.0direct
Gogithub.com/pion/datachannelv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/dtls/v3v3.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/ice/v4v4.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/interceptorv0.1.44indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/loggingv0.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/mdns/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/randutilv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/rtcpv1.2.16indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/rtpv1.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/sctpv1.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/sdp/v3v3.0.18indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/srtp/v3v3.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/stun/v3v3.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/transport/v4v4.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/turn/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/webrtc/v4v4.2.10-0.20260224155637-aa3b95c72dd2indirect
Gogithub.com/wlynxg/anetv0.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.48.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.10.0indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 36 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.48.0indirectcritical270.52.0
golang.org/x/imagev0.21.0indirecthigh100.43.0
golang.org/x/netv0.50.0directmoderate101.26.3
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.1directunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/textv0.34.0directunknown10.39.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.41.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.