Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 11:48 UTC

SanjulaGanepola / github-local-actions

✨ Run your GitHub Actions locally in VS Code!

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 761 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindEditor extensionLibraryhow this is determined

SanjulaGanepola/github-local-actions holds a health index of 27 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (77/100) and lowest on Vitality (28/100). It was last updated 531 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

27
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

27
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sanjula GanepolaPersonal account
91 followers30 public repossince Sep 2017@IBM

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 531 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push531
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases12 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 543 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~13.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv1.2.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release543
mean_days_between_releases13.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
46.7/60Stars761 stars
13/25Forks37 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks37
stars761
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.967
How it's scored
25.8/42Issue resolution62% of issues closed
12.1/30PR acceptance43/107 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs43
open_issues35
closed_issues56
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.615
closed_unmerged_prs64
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.1/25Owner reach91 followers of SanjulaGanepola
22.9/25Track record30 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers91
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSanjulaGanepola
public_repos30
account_age_days3,284
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://sanjulaganepola.github.io/github-local-actions-docs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsci, devops, github-actions, vscode, github, act
has_wikino
homepagehttps://sanjulaganepola.github.io/github-local-actions-docs/
docs_sitehttps://sanjulaganepola.github.io/github-local-actions-docs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
23/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: yaml 2.6.0 (moderate 4.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
36.1/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 177 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories39
affected_packages18
assessed_packages254
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 8, moderate 8, low 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 254 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt)
21.3/40Legible commit history40 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.4
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/39 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes49,515
source_files_sampled39
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

761GitHub stars
4contributors
0commits, last 12 months
531days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
35open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'github-local-actions' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿
0Stars
37Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383532024-112025-092026-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 8

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 11:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmchild_process^1.0.2package.json
npmoctokit^4.0.2package.json
npmsanitize-filename^1.6.3package.json
npmyaml^2.6.0package.json
All dependencies 254

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 250 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmchild_process1.0.2direct
npmoctokit4.0.2direct
npmsanitize-filename1.6.3direct
npmyaml2.6.0direct
npm@discoveryjs/json-ext0.5.7indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.19.0indirect
npm@eslint/core0.9.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.2.0indirect
npm@eslint/js9.15.0indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.2.3indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.6indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.3.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.6indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@octokit/app15.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-app7.1.3indirect
npm@octokit/auth-oauth-app8.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-oauth-device7.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-oauth-user5.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token5.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-unauthenticated6.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/core6.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint10.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/graphql8.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/oauth-app7.1.3indirect
npm@octokit/oauth-authorization-url7.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/oauth-methods5.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types22.2.0indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types8.5.1indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-graphql5.2.4indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest11.3.5indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods13.2.6indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-retry7.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-throttling9.3.2indirect
npm@octokit/request9.1.3indirect
npm@octokit/request-error6.1.5indirect
npm@octokit/types13.6.1indirect
npm@octokit/webhooks13.4.1indirect
npm@octokit/webhooks-methods5.1.0indirect
npm@types/aws-lambda8.10.145indirect
npm@types/eslint9.6.1indirect
npm@types/eslint-scope3.7.7indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.6indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node22.9.0indirect
npm@types/vscode1.93.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.14.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.14.0indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ast1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode1.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ieee7541.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/leb1281.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/utf81.11.6indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser1.12.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wast-printer1.12.1indirect
npm@webpack-cli/configtest2.1.1indirect
npm@webpack-cli/info2.0.2indirect
npm@webpack-cli/serve2.0.5indirect
npm@xtuc/ieee7541.2.0indirect
npm@xtuc/long4.2.2indirect
npmacorn8.14.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmajv-keywords3.5.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbefore-after-hook3.0.2indirect
npmbottleneck2.19.5indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowserslist4.24.0indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001664indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchrome-trace-event1.0.4indirect
npmclone-deep4.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcommander10.0.1indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.5indirect
npmdebug4.3.7indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.29indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.17.1indirect
npmenvinfo7.14.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.5.4indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.15.0indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmeslint-scope8.2.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.0indirect
npmespree10.3.0indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.3.1indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimport-local3.2.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminterpret3.1.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.15.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmjest-worker27.5.1indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmloader-runner4.3.0indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmneo-async2.6.2indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.18indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmrechoir0.8.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmschema-utils3.3.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.3indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.2indirect
npmshallow-clone3.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map0.7.4indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtapable2.2.1indirect
npmterser5.34.0indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.3.10indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtoad-cache3.7.0indirect
npmtruncate-utf8-bytes1.0.2indirect
npmts-api-utils1.3.0indirect
npmts-loader9.5.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.6.3indirect
npmundici-types6.19.8indirect
npmuniversal-github-app-jwt2.2.0indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.2indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.1.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutf8-byte-length1.0.5indirect
npmwatchpack2.4.2indirect
npmwebpack5.96.1indirect
npmwebpack-cli5.1.4indirect
npmwebpack-merge5.10.0indirect
npmwebpack-sources3.2.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwildcard2.0.1indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 18

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 254 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 18 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.3.1indirectcritical23.4.2
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
browserslist4.24.0indirecthigh24.28.7
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
minimatch9.0.5indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
serialize-javascript6.0.2indirecthigh27.0.5
yaml2.6.0directmoderate12.8.3
@eslint/plugin-kit0.2.3indirectmoderate10.3.4
@humanfs/node0.16.6indirectmoderate10.16.8
@octokit/endpoint10.1.1indirectmoderate110.1.3
@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest11.3.5indirectmoderate111.4.1
@octokit/request9.1.3indirectmoderate19.2.1
@octokit/request-error6.1.5indirectmoderate16.1.7
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
webpack5.96.1indirectlow25.104.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.