Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 19:42 UTC

Septh / ts-run

The minimalist TypeScript script runner for NodeJS

TypeScript · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2024View on GitHub ↗

Septh/ts-run holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Stephan SchreiberPersonal account
12 followers44 public repossince Apr 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@septh/ts-run2.2.110,401245 days agonoderuntimetypescriptscriptrunnercommonjsmodulecjsesm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
17/18Commit volume78 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year78
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~73.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv2.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases73.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.6/80Monthly downloads10,401 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@septh/ts-run
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads10,401
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
21.4/30PR acceptance5/7 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8/25Owner reach12 followers of Septh
24/25Track record44 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSepth
public_repos44
account_age_days4,117
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history24 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@septh/ts-run
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnode, runner, typescript
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages4
assessed_packages121
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 121 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history83 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.865
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtest/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstest/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/22 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes5,533
source_files_sampled22
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
78commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@septh/ts-run@2.2.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 19:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 121

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 121 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.30indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs28.0.6indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-terser1.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.2.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node24.3.0indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.4indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob10.4.5indirect
npmglob11.0.3indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjackspeak4.1.1indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.1.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.18indirect
npmminimatch10.2.4indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmresolve1.22.10indirect
npmrimraf6.0.1indirect
npmrollup4.59.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-code-raker1.0.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-fast-typescript2.1.2indirect
npmrollup-plugin-node-externals8.1.0indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsmob1.5.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmterser5.43.1indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-fest4.41.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.2indirect
npmundici-types7.10.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 121 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion2.0.2indirecthigh25.0.7
brace-expansion5.0.4indirecthigh35.0.7
glob10.4.5indirecthigh111.1.0
glob11.0.3indirecthigh111.1.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.