Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 14:21 UTC

ServiceComposer / ServiceComposer.AspNetCore

🧩 ServiceComposer, a ViewModel Composition API Gateway

C#Apache-2.0★ 95 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

ServiceComposer/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ServiceComposerOrganization
1 follower7 public repossince Nov 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetServiceComposer.AspNetCore5.2.2-4947 days agoservicesviewmodelcomposition

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 104 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year104
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 45 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 47 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~22.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tag4.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases22.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32/60Stars — 95 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars95
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
51.6/80Total downloads — 92,978 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesServiceComposer.AspNetCore
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads92,978
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.787
How it's scored
28.6/42Issue resolution — 68% of issues closed
25.5/30PR acceptance — 804/946 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs804
open_issues41
closed_issues87
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.68
closed_unmerged_prs142
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of ServiceComposer
18.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginServiceComposer
public_repos7
account_age_days3,255

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 47 days ago
20/20Version history — 49 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesServiceComposer.AspNetCore
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish47

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://milestone.topics.it/categories/view-model-composition
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshacktoberfest, composition-gateway, viewmodel-composition
has_wikino
homepagehttps://milestone.topics.it/categories/view-model-composition
docs_sitehttps://milestone.topics.it/categories/view-model-composition
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages20
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 20 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,823
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj, src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.csproj, src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifestssrc/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj, src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.csproj, src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj, src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.csproj, src/Snippets/Snippets.csproj, src/TestClassLibraryWithHandlers/TestClassLibraryWithHandlers.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/196 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes30,149
source_files_sampled196
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

95GitHub stars
6contributors
104commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
41open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151412019-052022-112026-05
Major 5Minor 21Patch 9

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 14:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained18 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetNuGet.Frameworks7.9.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit31.12.5src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.utility2.9.3src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.1src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.9.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMinVer8.0.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson10.0.13src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.13src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Testing4.0.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel10.0.13src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMELT1.1.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit31.12.5src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetFakeItEasy9.0.1src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.utility2.9.3src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.1src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel[10.0.3, 11.0.0)src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMinVer8.0.0src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402src/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore/ServiceComposer.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson10.0.13src/Snippets/Snippets.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting1.20.1src/Snippets/Snippets.csproj
All dependencies 21

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetFakeItEasy9.0.1direct
NuGetMELT1.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson10.0.13direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.13direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel10.0.13direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.402direct
NuGetMinVer8.0.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNuGet.Frameworks7.9.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting1.20.1direct
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4direct
NuGetServiceComposer.AspNetCore.Testing4.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2direct
NuGetVerify.Xunit31.12.5direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.utility2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.1direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 20 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.