Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 21:11 UTC

Shopify / job-iteration

Makes your background jobs interruptible and resumable by design.

RubyMIT★ 1,316 stars⑂ 61 forkssince Jun 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

Shopify/job-iteration holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ShopifyOrganization · verified domain
8,607 followers1,229 public repossince Apr 2008

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsjob-iteration1.15.1-490 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume150 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year150
human_commit_share0.75
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases16 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~71.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv1.15.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases71.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.6/60Stars1,316 stars
14.8/25Forks61 forks
13.9/15Watchers320 watchers
Inputs used
forks61
stars1,316
watchers320
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
73.1/80Total downloads10,818,527 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesjob-iteration
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads10,818,527
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth66 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled66
top_contributor_share0.419
How it's scored
19.6/42Issue resolution47% of issues closed
19.7/30PR acceptance430/654 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs430
open_issues32
closed_issues28
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.467
closed_unmerged_prs224
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach8,607 followers of Shopify
25/25Track record1,229 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers8,607
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginShopify
public_repos1,229
account_age_days6,724

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history49 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjob-iteration
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/job-iteration
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/job-iteration
docs_sitehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/job-iteration
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities40 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
20.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: yard 0.9.37 (moderate 5.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
35.3/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 153 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories40
affected_packages11
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 5, moderate 2, low 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37/40Legible commit history52 of 75 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.693
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance25 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.25
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/43 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes28,071
source_files_sampled43
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,316GitHub stars
66contributors
150commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
2bus factor
32open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 61 ⇿
0Stars
61Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050606032018-082022-092026-09
Major 0Minor 11Patch 3

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 21:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities40 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemssidekiqGemfile
RubyGemsresqueGemfile
RubyGemsdelayed_jobGemfile
RubyGemsconnection_poolGemfile
RubyGemsactiverecordGemfile
RubyGemsrailtiesGemfile
RubyGemsmysql2Gemfile
RubyGemsglobalidGemfile
RubyGemsi18nGemfile
RubyGemsredisGemfile
RubyGemspryGemfile
RubyGemsmochaGemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-shopifyGemfile
RubyGemsyardGemfile
RubyGemsrakeGemfile
RubyGemscsvGemfile
RubyGemsmutex_mGemfile
RubyGemsjsonGemfile
RubyGemssorbet-runtimeGemfile
RubyGemstapiocaGemfile
RubyGemsloggerGemfile
All dependencies 96

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.1direct
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.1direct
RubyGemscsv3.3.5direct
RubyGemsdelayed_job4.1.13direct
RubyGemsglobalid1.3.0direct
RubyGemsi18n1.14.7direct
RubyGemsjson3.0.2direct
RubyGemslogger1.7.0direct
RubyGemsmocha2.8.2direct
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0direct
RubyGemspry0.15.2direct
RubyGemsrailties8.1.1direct
RubyGemsrake13.3.1direct
RubyGemsredis5.4.1direct
RubyGemsresque3.0.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-shopify2.18.0direct
RubyGemssidekiq8.0.10direct
RubyGemssorbet-runtime0.6.13502direct
RubyGemstapioca0.20.0direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.37direct
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejobindirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.1indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.3indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.5indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.0indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.0indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsirb1.15.3indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.24.1indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.26.2indirect
RubyGemsmono_logger1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.21.2indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.0.4indirect
RubyGemsnetrc0.11.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.10.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.2.6indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrbi0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.2.1.pre.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.15.1indirect
RubyGemsredis-client0.26.1indirect
RubyGemsredis-namespace1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrequire-hooks0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.91.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubydex0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssinatra4.2.1indirect
RubyGemssorbet0.6.13502indirect
RubyGemssorbet-static0.6.13502indirect
RubyGemssorbet-static-and-runtime0.6.13502indirect
RubyGemsspoom1.8.7indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstilt2.6.1indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.4.4indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.3indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rack-session2.1.1indirectcritical12.1.2
activesupport8.1.1indirecthigh38.1.2.1
concurrent-ruby1.3.5indirecthigh31.3.7
erb6.0.0indirecthigh16.0.4
nokogiri1.19.0indirecthigh111.19.4
rack3.2.4indirecthigh153.2.6
yard0.9.37directmoderate20.9.44
loofah2.24.1indirectmoderate12.25.2
actionpack8.1.1indirectlow18.1.2.1
actionview8.1.1indirectlow18.1.2.1
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirectlow11.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.