Public recordModerate
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:18 UTC
Shusek / kotlin-runtime-web-assembly
Kotlin Runtime Web Assembly
Shusek/kotlin-runtime-web-assembly holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
59
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
ShusekPersonal account
2 followers18 public repossince Mar 2013
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
98
Development activity
96Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 3 days ago |
| 31.8/36 | Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 423 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 423 |
| human_commit_share | 0.62 |
| days_since_last_push | 3 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 46 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 4 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 3 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~6.6 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 4 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.3.4 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 3 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 6.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
12
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 0 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 0 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | no |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
57
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 12.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 35 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 36 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 35 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.463 |
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 29.2/30 | PR acceptance — 72/74 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 72 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 18 |
| prs_decided_30d | 18 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 2 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
43Weak
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 3.4/25 | Owner reach — 2 followers of Shusek |
| 21.3/25 | Track record — 18 public repos, account ~13 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 2 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | Shusek |
| public_repos | 18 |
| account_age_days | 4,954 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
45
Engineering practices
48Weak
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 3 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://shusek.github.io/kotlin-runtime-web-assembly/ |
| 0/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://shusek.github.io/kotlin-runtime-web-assembly/ |
| docs_site | https://shusek.github.io/kotlin-runtime-web-assembly/ |
| has_readme | no |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | no |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
50
Security posture
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 36 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 3.8/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 16 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 2 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
84
Agent context & guidance
84Excellent
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENT.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 38.7/40 | Legible commit history — 45 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.726 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENT.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 5,113 |
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — build.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, modules/annotations/annotations/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Kotlin (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 17 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 38 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0.17 |
| toolchain_manifests | build.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, modules/annotations/annotations/build.gradle.kts, modules/annotations/processor/build.gradle.kts, modules/bom/build.gradle.kts, modules/component-model/build.gradle.kts, modules/component-model/src/test/fixtures/json-sequence-guest/build.gradle.kts, modules/component-model/src/test/fixtures/wasm-wasi-generated-compile/build.gradle.kts, modules/log/build.gradle.kts, modules/runtime-wasmtime-android/build.gradle.kts, modules/runtime/build.gradle.kts, modules/runtime/src/wasmtime-p3-bridge/Cargo.toml, modules/wasi-preview3/build.gradle.kts, modules/wasi/build.gradle.kts, modules/wasm/build.gradle.kts, samples/android-tests/build.gradle.kts, samples/android-tests/device-tests/build.gradle.kts, samples/ios-runtime-smoke/build.gradle.kts, samples/sample/build.gradle.kts, testing/jmh/build.gradle.kts, testing/runtime-tests/build.gradle.kts, testing/wasi-tests/build.gradle.kts, testing/wasm-corpus/build.gradle.kts, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/dotnet/basic/DemoDotNetWasi.csproj, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/kotlin/hello-world/build.gradle.kts, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/rust-atomics/sieve-primes/Cargo.toml, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/rust/count_vowels/Cargo.toml, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/rust/greet-wasi/Cargo.toml, testing/wasm-corpus/src/main/resources/rust/hello-wasi/Cargo.toml, tools/cli/build.gradle.kts, tools/codegen/build.gradle.kts, tools/component-model-gradle-plugin/build.gradle.kts, tools/component-model-tooling/build.gradle.kts, tools/test-gen-lib/build.gradle.kts, tools/wabt/build.gradle.kts, tools/wasi-test-gen/build.gradle.kts, tools/wasm-tools/build.gradle.kts |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.38 |
Code legibility for models
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed) |
| 53.2/55 | Manageable file sizes — 16/499 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Kotlin |
| largest_source_bytes | 308,963 |
| source_files_sampled | 499 |
| oversized_source_files | 16 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — sample, samples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | sample, samples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
0GitHub stars
35contributors
423commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
4releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Maven, PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Community profile unavailable
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 0 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 36 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 10 | Token-Permissions | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 5 | Vulnerabilities | 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.