Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-03 06:10 UTC

Sicos1977 / MSGReader

C# Outlook MSG file reader without the need for Outlook

C#MIT★ 553 stars⑂ 185 forkssince Feb 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined

Sicos1977/MSGReader holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KeesPersonal account
151 followers29 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMsgReader6.1.1-30 days agooutlookmsgsignedemlcontactappointmenttask

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume122 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year122
human_commit_share0.57
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~41.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag6.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases41.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.5/60Stars553 stars
18.9/25Forks185 forks
8.6/15Watchers36 watchers
Inputs used
forks185
stars553
watchers36
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.5/80Total downloads9,545,260 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMsgReader
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads9,545,260
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth42 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled42
top_contributor_share0.674
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
26.3/30PR acceptance107/122 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs107
open_issues3
closed_issues406
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.993
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.7/25Owner reach151 followers of Sicos1977
22.8/25Track record29 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers151
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSicos1977
public_repos29
account_age_days4,582
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
12/20Version history3 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMsgReader
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://sicos1977.github.io/MSGReader
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsoutlook, msg, eml, email, email-parsing
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://sicos1977.github.io/MSGReader
docs_sitehttp://sicos1977.github.io/MSGReader
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.9/40Legible commit history33 of 57 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.579
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapConverter/Html/ConverterHtml2008.csproj, Converter/Html/ConverterHtml2010.csproj, MsgMapper/MsgMapper.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsConverter/Html/ConverterHtml2008.csproj, Converter/Html/ConverterHtml2010.csproj, MsgMapper/MsgMapper.csproj, MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj, MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj, MsgViewer/MsgViewer.csproj, Utilities/EmailExtractor/EmailExtractor.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
52.7/55Manageable file sizes6/145 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes212,817
source_files_sampled145
oversized_source_files6

Key facts

553GitHub stars
42contributors
122commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
3open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 185 ⇿
0Stars
185Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020018132014-032020-052026-08
Major 3Minor 16Patch 78

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-03 06:09 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.11MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics10.0.100MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics10.0.100MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn110.0.11MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics10.0.100MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream3.0.1MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetOpenMcdf3.2.0MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetRtfPipe2.0.7677.4303MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.7.0MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs10.0.11MsgReader/MsgReader.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.4.0MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.4.0MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.11MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs10.0.11MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.11MsgReaderTests/MsgReaderTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs10.0.11MsgViewer/MsgViewer.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream3.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics10.0.100direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.4.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.4.0direct
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3direct
NuGetOpenMcdf3.2.0direct
NuGetRtfPipe2.0.7677.4303direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn110.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs10.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11direct
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.WindowsAPICodePack-Core1.1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WindowsAPICodePack-Shell1.1.0.0indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePack-Core1.1.2indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePack-Shell1.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.