Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 01:44 UTC

SignatureBeef / Open-Terraria-API

Open Terraria API - Mac, Linux & Windows

C#GPL-3.0★ 123 stars⑂ 48 forkssince Aug 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationhow this is determined

SignatureBeef/Open-Terraria-API holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (64/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LukePersonal account
51 followers43 public repossince May 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume49 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year49
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,374 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_taglauncher-windows
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,374
mean_days_between_releases0

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.8/60Stars123 stars
13.9/25Forks48 forks
5.6/15Watchers11 watchers
Inputs used
forks48
stars123
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.709
How it's scored
30/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
13.5/30PR acceptance59/131 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues10
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.714
closed_unmerged_prs72
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach51 followers of SignatureBeef
24/25Track record43 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers51
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSignatureBeef
public_repos43
account_age_days5,584
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraria, otapi, il, cecil, mod, api, framework, modding, nuget, terraria-server
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.6
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: Newtonsoft.Json 10.0.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,522 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages36
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 36 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.9/40Legible commit history9 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.093
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapOTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj, OTAPI.Common/OTAPI.Common.csproj, OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsOTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj, OTAPI.Common/OTAPI.Common.csproj, OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj, OTAPI.Scripts/OTAPI.Scripts.csproj, OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj, examples/RuntimeExample.Client/RuntimeExample.Client.csproj, examples/RuntimeExample.Server/RuntimeExample.Server.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/241 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes51,407
source_files_sampled241
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

123GitHub stars
15contributors
49commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
10open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 48 ⇿
0Stars
48Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504742015-102021-032026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 01:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 50
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAvalonia11.2.5OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop11.2.5OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Diagnostics11.2.5OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetCefGlue.Avalonia120.6099.210OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetCefGlue.Common120.6099.210OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMaterial.Avalonia3.9.2OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetProjektanker.Icons.Avalonia.FontAwesome9.6.1OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetReactiveUI20.1.63OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSteamworks.NET2024.8.0OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reactive.Linq6.0.1OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registry6.0.0-preview.5.21301.5OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetImGui.NET1.91.6.1OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.ClearScript1.1.15OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.CSharp1.1.15OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.Lua1.1.15OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common9.0.2OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour.HookGen22.7.31.1OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod22.7.31.1OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour25.2.3OTAPI.Client.Launcher/OTAPI.Client.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registry6.0.0-preview.5.21301.5OTAPI.Common/OTAPI.Common.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.ClearScript1.1.15OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.CSharp1.1.15OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.Lua1.1.15OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSteamworks.NET2024.8.0OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour.HookGen22.7.31.1OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour25.2.3OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissions9.0.2OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common9.0.2OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Packaging9.0.2OTAPI.Patcher/OTAPI.Patcher.csproj
NuGetSteamworks.NET2024.8.0OTAPI.Scripts/OTAPI.Scripts.csproj
NuGetModFramework1.1.15OTAPI.Scripts/OTAPI.Scripts.csproj
NuGetMonoMod22.7.31.1OTAPI.Scripts/OTAPI.Scripts.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3OTAPI.Scripts/OTAPI.Scripts.csproj
NuGetModFramework1.1.15OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.ClearScript1.1.15OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.CSharp1.1.15OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetModFramework.Modules.Lua1.1.15OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSteamworks.NET2024.8.0OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager9.0.2OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common9.0.2OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Packaging9.0.2OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissions9.0.2OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMono.Cecil0.11.6OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod22.7.31.1OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour25.2.3OTAPI.Server.Launcher/OTAPI.Server.Launcher.csproj
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAvalonia11.2.5direct
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop11.2.5direct
NuGetAvalonia.Diagnostics11.2.5direct
NuGetCefGlue.Avalonia120.6099.210direct
NuGetCefGlue.Common120.6099.210direct
NuGetImGui.NET1.91.6.1direct
NuGetMaterial.Avalonia3.9.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registry6.0.0-preview.5.21301.5direct
NuGetModFramework1.1.15direct
NuGetModFramework.Modules.ClearScript1.1.15direct
NuGetModFramework.Modules.CSharp1.1.15direct
NuGetModFramework.Modules.Lua1.1.15direct
NuGetMono.Cecil0.11.6direct
NuGetMono.Cecil0.9.6.4direct
NuGetMonoMod22.7.31.1direct
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour25.2.3direct
NuGetMonoMod.RuntimeDetour.HookGen22.7.31.1direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json10.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetProjektanker.Icons.Avalonia.FontAwesome9.6.1direct
NuGetReactiveUI20.1.63direct
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2direct
NuGetSteamworks.NET2024.8.0direct
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager5.0.0-preview.3.20214.6direct
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager9.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common9.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Packaging5.0.0-preview.3.20214.6direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Packaging9.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2direct
NuGetSystem.Reactive.Linq6.0.1direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissions9.0.2direct
NuGetILRepack.Lib2.0.15indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Xdt2.1.1indirect
NuGetNDesk.Options0.2.1indirect
NuGetNuGet.Core2.14.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 36 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json10.0.3directhigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.