Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-31 10:27 UTC

Siilwyn / css-declaration-sorter

Sort CSS declarations fast and automatically in a certain order.

JavaScriptISC★ 385 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Jan 2016View on GitHub ↗

Siilwyn/css-declaration-sorter holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SelwynPersonal account

97 followers48 public repossince Oct 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	css-declaration-sorter	7.4.0	64,138,361	48	145 days ago	postcss postcss-plugin css declaration sorter property order

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18	Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	22
human_commit_share	0.62
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 40 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36	Release recency — latest release 146 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~115.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	40
latest_release_tag	v7.4.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	146
mean_days_between_releases	115.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate

How it's scored

41.9/60	Stars — 385 stars
11/25	Forks — 22 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	22
stars	385
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (ISC)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 64,138,361 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	css-declaration-sorter
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	64,138,361
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.949

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate

How it's scored

41.2/42	Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
11.9/30	PR acceptance — 187/472 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	187
open_issues	1
closed_issues	56
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.982
closed_unmerged_prs	285
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.3/25	Owner reach — 97 followers of Siilwyn
24.3/25	Track record — 48 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	97
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	Siilwyn
public_repos	48
account_age_days	4,701

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 145 days ago
20/20	Version history — 48 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	css-declaration-sorter
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	145

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://npmjs.com/css-declaration-sorter
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 1 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	postcss
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://npmjs.com/css-declaration-sorter
docs_site	https://npmjs.com/css-declaration-sorter
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
4/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 18 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	20
affected_packages	10
assessed_packages	128
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 6, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 128 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

5Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.2/40	Legible commit history — 6 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.097
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

31At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 38 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.38

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	10,771
source_files_sampled	12
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

385GitHub stars

9contributors

22commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

40releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿

0Stars

22Forks

36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 6Minor 9Patch 21

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10

5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-31 10:26 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
6	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8	CI-Tests	15 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
8	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	18 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 128

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 128 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.3`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.5.3`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.39.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@mdn/browser-compat-data	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-dynamic-import-vars	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	astring	`1.8.6`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	diff	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.2.12`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	kleur	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.10`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.4`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.52.4`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sade	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	uvu	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 128 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.1`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
rollup	`4.52.4`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
braces	`3.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`3.0.3`
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
diff	`5.1.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.3`
micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.0.8`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records