Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-07 05:03 UTC

SkyChains / evm

▼ LUX EVM: Launch your own Ethereum compatible EVM on Lux Network.

GoLGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2025forkView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

SkyChains/evm holds a health index of 31 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 496 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

31
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

31
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 37 is calibrated to 31 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SkyChainsOrganization
0 followers12 public repossince Mar 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/skychains/evmv0.1.0-1507 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

21At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 496 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push496
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 496 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release496
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (LGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

65Good
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 36 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 41 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled36
top_contributor_share0.29

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of SkyChains
11/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginSkyChains
public_repos12
account_age_days531

Package maintenance

63Moderate
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 507 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/skychains/evm
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish507

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://lux.network
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://lux.network
docs_sitehttps://lux.network
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 41 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 175 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://lux.network/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 73 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://lux.network/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.777
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — contracts/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscontracts/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 7/730 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes126,155
source_files_sampled730
oversized_source_files7

Key facts

0GitHub stars
36contributors
0commits, last 12 months
496days since last push
1releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch npm package '@avalabs/evm-contracts' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-07 05:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 41 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities175 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers^2.2.3contracts/package.json
npm@nomiclabs/hardhat-waffle^2.0.6contracts/package.json
npm@types/node^16.7.1contracts/package.json
npm@skychains/bridge^3.17.0contracts/package.json
npmethers^5.4.5contracts/package.json
npmhardhat2.17.1contracts/package.json
npmts-node^10.9.1contracts/package.json
npmtypescript^5.1.6contracts/package.json
npm@openzeppelin/contracts^4.9.3contracts/package.json
npmds-testhttps://github.com/dapphub/ds-test.gitcontracts/package.json
Gogithub.com/VictoriaMetrics/fastcachev1.12.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/cespare/cpv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/pebblev1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccgo.mod
Gogithub.com/deckarep/golang-set/v2v2.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv24.0.7+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/dop251/gojav0.0.0-20231027120936-b396bb4c349dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/ethereum/go-ethereumv1.13.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gballet/go-libpcsclitev0.0.0-20191108122812-4678299bea08go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-cmd/cmdv1.4.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/rpcv1.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-bexprv0.1.13go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lruv1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/holiman/bloomfilter/v2v2.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/holiman/uint256v1.2.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/kylelemons/godebugv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/skychains/netrunnerv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/skychains/chainv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv0.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.13.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.30.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.18.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutilv3.21.11+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.18.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/status-im/keycard-gov0.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/syndtr/goleveldbv1.0.1-0.20220614013038-64ee5596c38ago.mod
Gogithub.com/tyler-smith/go-bip39v1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.1go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.4.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.18.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.5.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.16.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.14.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.5.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.32.0go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with SkyChains/evm. Read them side by side →

100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional99authelia/autheliaThe Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps, now OpenID Certified™Exceptional99cloudposse/atmosAtmos is the open-source runtime for infrastructure — it builds, authenticates, and ships Terraform, OpenTofu, Packer, Ansible, Kubernetes, Helm, and containers the same way on your laptop, in CI, and with AI agents.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.